FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STANDARDS AND ENFORCEMENT

Water quality related effluent limitations

33 U.S.C. § 1312
Title33Navigation and Navigable Waters
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STANDARDS AND ENFORCEMENT

This text of 33 U.S.C. § 1312 (Water quality related effluent limitations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 1312.

Text

(a)Establishment Whenever, in the judgment of the Administrator or as identified under section 1314(l) of this title, discharges of pollutants from a point source or group of point sources, with the application of effluent limitations required under section 1311(b)(2) of this title, would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of that water quality in a specific portion of the navigable waters which shall assure protection of public health, public water supplies, agricultural and industrial uses, and the protection and propagation of a balanced population of shellfish, fish and wildlife, and allow recreational activities in and on the water, effluent limitations (including alternative effluent control strategies) for such point source or sources shall be established which can reason

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
603 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 2024)
454 case citations
American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
452 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1981)
429 case citations
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
557 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 2009)
108 case citations
Costle v. Pacific Legal Foundation
445 U.S. 198 (Supreme Court, 1980)
93 case citations
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Costle
568 F.2d 1369 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
67 case citations
United States v. Hercules, Inc.
247 F.3d 706 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
52 case citations
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins
53 F.3d 533 (Second Circuit, 1995)
49 case citations
Sierra Club v. John Hankinson
296 F.3d 1021 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
43 case citations
Sun Enterprises, Ltd. v. Train
532 F.2d 280 (Second Circuit, 1976)
42 case citations
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency
538 F.2d 513 (Second Circuit, 1976)
40 case citations
United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.
489 F. Supp. 870 (E.D. Arkansas, 1980)
35 case citations
Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates
378 P.3d 356 (California Supreme Court, 2016)
27 case citations
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Fola Coal Company, LLC
845 F.3d 133 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
18 case citations
Sun Enterprises., Ltd. v. Train
394 F. Supp. 211 (S.D. New York, 1975)
14 case citations
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. City of New York
451 F.3d 77 (Second Circuit, 2006)
9 case citations
American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
278 F.R.D. 98 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
8 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title III, §302, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 846; amended Pub. L. 100–4, title III, §308(e), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 39.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(2), inserted "or as identified under section 1314(l) of this title" after "Administrator" and "public health," after "protection of".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(1), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows:
"(1) Prior to establishment of any effluent limitation pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Administrator shall issue notice of intent to establish such limitation and within ninety days of such notice hold a public hearing to determine the relationship of the economic and social costs of achieving any such limitation or limitations, including any economic or social dislocation in the affected community or communities, to the social and economic benefits to be obtained (including the attainment of the objective of this chapter) and to determine whether or not such effluent limitations can be implemented with available technology or other alternative control strategies.
"(2) If a person affected by such limitation demonstrates at such hearing that (whether or not such technology or other alternative control strategies are available) there is no reasonable relationship between the economic and social costs and the benefits to be obtained (including attainment of the objective of this chapter), such limitation shall not become effective and the Administrator shall adjust such limitation as it applies to such person."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/1312.