FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STANDARDS AND ENFORCEMENT
Water quality related effluent limitations
33 U.S.C. § 1312
Title33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STANDARDS AND ENFORCEMENT
This text of 33 U.S.C. § 1312 (Water quality related effluent limitations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 1312.
Text
(a)Establishment
Whenever, in the judgment of the Administrator or as identified under section 1314(l) of this title, discharges of pollutants from a point source or group of point sources, with the application of effluent limitations required under section 1311(b)(2) of this title, would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of that water quality in a specific portion of the navigable waters which shall assure protection of public health, public water supplies, agricultural and industrial uses, and the protection and propagation of a balanced population of shellfish, fish and wildlife, and allow recreational activities in and on the water, effluent limitations (including alternative effluent control strategies) for such point source or sources shall be established which can reason
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
603 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 2024)
American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
452 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
557 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Costle v. Pacific Legal Foundation
445 U.S. 198 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Costle
568 F.2d 1369 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
Sierra Club, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation, Defendants
813 F.2d 1480 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Hercules, Inc.
247 F.3d 706 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins
53 F.3d 533 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Sierra Club v. John Hankinson
296 F.3d 1021 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
Sun Enterprises, Ltd. v. Train
532 F.2d 280 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency
538 F.2d 513 (Second Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.
489 F. Supp. 870 (E.D. Arkansas, 1980)
Northwest Environmental Advocates, a Non-Profit Oregon Corporation and Nina Bell v. City of Portland
11 F.3d 900 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Citizens Coal Council and Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
447 F.3d 879 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates
378 P.3d 356 (California Supreme Court, 2016)
Ford Motor Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and State of Michigan, Intervenor
567 F.2d 661 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Fola Coal Company, LLC
845 F.3d 133 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Sun Enterprises., Ltd. v. Train
394 F. Supp. 211 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. City of New York
451 F.3d 77 (Second Circuit, 2006)
American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
278 F.R.D. 98 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
Source Credit
History
(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title III, §302, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 846; amended Pub. L. 100–4, title III, §308(e), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 39.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(2), inserted "or as identified under section 1314(l) of this title" after "Administrator" and "public health," after "protection of".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(1), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows:
"(1) Prior to establishment of any effluent limitation pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Administrator shall issue notice of intent to establish such limitation and within ninety days of such notice hold a public hearing to determine the relationship of the economic and social costs of achieving any such limitation or limitations, including any economic or social dislocation in the affected community or communities, to the social and economic benefits to be obtained (including the attainment of the objective of this chapter) and to determine whether or not such effluent limitations can be implemented with available technology or other alternative control strategies.
"(2) If a person affected by such limitation demonstrates at such hearing that (whether or not such technology or other alternative control strategies are available) there is no reasonable relationship between the economic and social costs and the benefits to be obtained (including attainment of the objective of this chapter), such limitation shall not become effective and the Administrator shall adjust such limitation as it applies to such person."
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(2), inserted "or as identified under section 1314(l) of this title" after "Administrator" and "public health," after "protection of".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–4, §308(e)(1), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows:
"(1) Prior to establishment of any effluent limitation pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Administrator shall issue notice of intent to establish such limitation and within ninety days of such notice hold a public hearing to determine the relationship of the economic and social costs of achieving any such limitation or limitations, including any economic or social dislocation in the affected community or communities, to the social and economic benefits to be obtained (including the attainment of the objective of this chapter) and to determine whether or not such effluent limitations can be implemented with available technology or other alternative control strategies.
"(2) If a person affected by such limitation demonstrates at such hearing that (whether or not such technology or other alternative control strategies are available) there is no reasonable relationship between the economic and social costs and the benefits to be obtained (including attainment of the objective of this chapter), such limitation shall not become effective and the Administrator shall adjust such limitation as it applies to such person."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/1312.