FEDERAL · 32 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Maintenance of other troops

32 U.S.C. § 109
Title32National Guard
Chapter1 — ORGANIZATION

This text of 32 U.S.C. § 109 (Maintenance of other troops) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
32 U.S.C. § 109.

Text

(a)In time of peace, a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands may maintain no troops other than those of its National Guard and defense forces authorized by subsection (c).
(b)Nothing in this title limits the right of a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands to use its National Guard or its defense forces authorized by subsection (c) within its borders in time of peace, or prevents it from organizing and maintaining police or constabulary.
(c)In addition to its National Guard, if any, a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands may, as provided by its laws, organize and maintain defense forces. A defense force established under

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perpich v. United States Department of Defense
880 F.2d 11 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
182 case citations
Perpich v. Department of Defense
496 U.S. 334 (Supreme Court, 1990)
165 case citations
Nelson v. Geringer
295 F.3d 1082 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
110 case citations
Hickman v. Block
81 F.3d 98 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
65 case citations
Holmes v. California National Guard
109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 154 (California Court of Appeal, 2001)
55 case citations
Wallace v. State
933 P.2d 1157 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1997)
14 case citations
Michigan Council of Trout Unlimited v. Department of Military Affairs
539 N.W.2d 745 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1995)
11 case citations
Abbott v. Biden
70 F.4th 817 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
3 case citations
Abbott v. Biden
(E.D. Texas, 2022)
Oklahoma State of v. Biden
(W.D. Oklahoma, 2021)
Pemberton v. Burke
18 V.I. 371 (Virgin Islands, 1981)
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
(California Attorney General Reports, 1986)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 600; Pub. L. 85–861, §2(2), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1542; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(h)(4)(B), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4377.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "those of its National Guard" are substituted for the words "as authorized in accordance with the organization prescribed under this Act".
In subsections (a) and (b), the provisions of 32:194(c) are exhausted by the enumeration of the jurisdictions named.
In subsection (b), the words "Nothing in this title limits" are substituted for the words "Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to limit".
In subsection (c), the words "heretofore authorized by this Act [sic]", "as such", and "in any manner" are omitted as surplusage.
In subsection (d), the words "under any Federal law" are omitted since only Federal law could require service in the armed forces. The word "military" is omitted as surplusage.
In subsection (e), the words "defense force" are substituted for the words "organized militia" for accuracy and to conform to subsection (c). The words "reserve component of the armed forces" are substituted for the words "Reserve Forces as defined in section 901 of Title 50", since that term is not defined in the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Subsecs. (a) to (c). Pub. L. 111–383 amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–163, §1057(b)(3). See 2006 Amendment note below.
2006—Subsecs. (a) to (c). Pub. L. 109–163, §1057(b)(3), as amended by Pub. L. 111–383, substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or the District of Columbia".
1988—Subsecs. (a) to (c). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Virgin Islands,".
1958—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 85–861, §2(2)(A), substituted "defense forces authorized by subsection (c)" for "State defense forces".
Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 85–861, §2(2)(B), added subsecs. (c) to (e).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(h), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4377, provided that the amendment made by section 1075(h)(4)(B) is effective as of Jan. 6, 2006, and as if included in Pub. L. 109–163 as enacted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 U.S.C. § 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/32/109.