FEDERAL · 32 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Forfeiture of Federal benefits

32 U.S.C. § 108
Title32National Guard
Chapter1 — ORGANIZATION

This text of 32 U.S.C. § 108 (Forfeiture of Federal benefits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
32 U.S.C. § 108.

Text

If, within a time fixed by the President, a State fails to comply with a requirement of this title, or a regulation prescribed under this title, the National Guard of that State is barred, in whole or in part, as the President may prescribe, from receiving money or any other aid, benefit, or privilege authorized by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reid Knutson v. Wisconsin Air National Guard and Gerald D. Slack
995 F.2d 765 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
62 case citations
James M. MacFarlane v. Ella T. Grasso
696 F.2d 217 (Second Circuit, 1982)
44 case citations
Krause v. Rhodes
471 F.2d 430 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
17 case citations
Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States
603 F.3d 989 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
15 case citations
Craig Morgan v. James Rhodes
456 F.2d 608 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
12 case citations
Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States
601 F. Supp. 2d 146 (District of Columbia, 2009)
10 case citations
Wigginton v. Centracchio
787 A.2d 1151 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2001)
10 case citations
Hazelton v. State Personnel Commission
505 N.W.2d 793 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1993)
9 case citations
Holmes v. California Army National Guard
920 F. Supp. 1510 (N.D. California, 1996)
7 case citations
Kise v. Department of Military & Veterans Affairs
784 A.2d 253 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
4 case citations
Abbott v. Biden
70 F.4th 817 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
3 case citations
Farmer v. Mabus
757 F. Supp. 1462 (S.D. Mississippi, 1991)
1 case citations
Abbott v. Biden
(E.D. Texas, 2022)
Oklahoma State of v. Biden
(W.D. Oklahoma, 2021)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 600; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §904(c), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2827.)

Editorial Notes

The words "does not comply" are substituted for the words "shall * * * have failed or refused to comply". The words "a requirement of, or regulation prescribed under, this title" are substituted for the words "any requirement of this title, or any regulation promulgated thereunder and in aid thereof by the President or the Secretary of the Army". The words "money or any other aid" are substituted for the words "pecuniary or other aid". The words "or provided by this title or any other" are omitted as surplusage.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–337 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or enforce a requirement of, or regulation prescribed under, this title its National Guard is barred, wholly or partly as the President may prescribe, from receiving money or any other aid, benefit, or privilege authorized by law."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 effective at end of 90-day period beginning on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 904(d) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10501 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 U.S.C. § 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/32/108.