FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Setoff against judgment
31 U.S.C. § 3728
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 3728 (Setoff against judgment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 3728.
Text
(a)The Secretary of the Treasury shall withhold paying that part of a judgment against the United States Government presented to the Secretary that is equal to a debt the plaintiff owes the Government.
(b)The Secretary shall—
(1)discharge the debt if the plaintiff agrees to the setoff and discharges a part of the judgment equal to the debt; or
(2)(A) withhold payment of an additional amount the Secretary decides will cover legal costs of bringing a civil action for the debt if the plaintiff denies the debt or does not agree to the setoff; and
(B)have a civil action brought if one has not already been brought.
(c)If the Government loses a civil action to recover a debt or recovers less than the amount the Secretary withholds under this section, the Secretary shall pay the plaintiff the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Cascade Roads, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Peter H. Arkison, Trustee
34 F.3d 756 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Michael Ikelionwu v. United States
150 F.3d 233 (Second Circuit, 1998)
Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins
943 F.2d 1297 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
Drg Funding Corporation v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
76 F.3d 1212 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LTV Steel Co. (In re Chateaugay Corp.)
94 F.3d 772 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Eugene A. Tafoya
803 F.2d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Amoco Production Company v. Thomas A. Fry, Director, Minerals Management Service
118 F.3d 812 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Stiles v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 1 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Montavon v. United States
864 F. Supp. 519 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Farms v. United States
13 Cl. Ct. 48 (Court of Claims, 1987)
Hornbeck Offshore Operators, Inc. v. Ocean Line of Bermuda, Inc.
849 F. Supp. 434 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Marré v. United States
117 F.3d 297 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. 717.42 Acres of Land, Etc.
955 F.2d 376 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Greene v. United States
124 Fed. Cl. 636 (Federal Claims, 2015)
Stephens v. Astrue
539 F. Supp. 2d 802 (D. Maryland, 2008)
Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States
366 F. Supp. 2d 1008 (E.D. Washington, 2005)
Doko Farms v. United States
21 Cl. Ct. 696 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Lopes v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
211 B.R. 443 (D. Rhode Island, 1997)
Petro Mex, LLC v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2023)
Stacy v. United States
(N.D. Illinois, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 977; Pub. L. 104–316, title II, §202(p), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3844.)
Editorial Notes
In the section, the words "of the United States" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (a), the words "final . . . recovered . . . duly allowed by legal authority", "for payment", and "in any manner, whether as principal or surety" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(1), the words "due from the plaintiff to the United States" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(2)(A), the words "of such judgment", "be sufficient to", and "charges and" are omitted as surplus. The words "of bringing a civil action" are substituted for "in prosecuting the debt" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "of the United States to final judgment" and "to the United States" are omitted as surplus.
Subsection (b)(2)(B) is substituted for 31:227(3d sentence) for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c), the words "for debt and costs", "thereon", and "from the plaintiff" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–316, §202(p)(1), (2), substituted "Secretary of the Treasury" for "Comptroller General" before "shall withhold" and "Secretary" for "Comptroller General" after "presented to the".
Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 104–316, §202(p)(2), substituted "Secretary" for "Comptroller General" wherever appearing.
In subsection (a), the words "final . . . recovered . . . duly allowed by legal authority", "for payment", and "in any manner, whether as principal or surety" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(1), the words "due from the plaintiff to the United States" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(2)(A), the words "of such judgment", "be sufficient to", and "charges and" are omitted as surplus. The words "of bringing a civil action" are substituted for "in prosecuting the debt" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "of the United States to final judgment" and "to the United States" are omitted as surplus.
Subsection (b)(2)(B) is substituted for 31:227(3d sentence) for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c), the words "for debt and costs", "thereon", and "from the plaintiff" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–316, §202(p)(1), (2), substituted "Secretary of the Treasury" for "Comptroller General" before "shall withhold" and "Secretary" for "Comptroller General" after "presented to the".
Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 104–316, §202(p)(2), substituted "Secretary" for "Comptroller General" wherever appearing.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 3728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/3728.