FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE
Exemption from taxation
31 U.S.C. § 3124
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 3124 (Exemption from taxation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 3124.
Text
(a)Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt from taxation by a State or political subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be considered in computing a tax, except—
(1)a nondiscriminatory franchise tax or another nonproperty tax instead of a franchise tax, imposed on a corporation; and
(2)an estate or inheritance tax.
(b)The tax status of interest on obligations and dividends, earnings, or other income from evidences of ownership issued by the Government or an agency and the tax treatment of gain and loss from the disposition of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.). An oblig
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of Guam v. United States
578 F.3d 1318 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Dallas County
463 U.S. 855 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Rockford Life Insurance v. Illinois Department of Revenue
482 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Nebraska Department of Revenue v. Loewenstein
513 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1994)
First Bank of Buffalo v. Conrad
350 N.W.2d 580 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
Antonio Gumataotao v. Director of Department of Revenue and Taxation
236 F.3d 1077 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
In Re Thomas C. Sawyer Estate
546 A.2d 784 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1987)
Schwinden v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
691 P.2d 1351 (Montana Supreme Court, 1984)
Herschend v. Director of Revenue
896 S.W.2d 458 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1995)
Cambridge State Bank v. Roemer
457 N.W.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1990)
Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State
222 A.D.2d 36 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. Maryland National Bank
531 A.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Comptroller of the Treasury, Income Tax Division v. First United Bank & Trust
578 A.2d 192 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Yurista v. Commissioner of Revenue
460 N.W.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1990)
County of Orange v. Fuji Securities, Inc.
31 F. Supp. 2d 768 (C.D. California, 1998)
Kerr v. Waddell
899 P.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
Roxborough Manayunk Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Commonwealth
687 A.2d 1202 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
First National Bank of Fredericksburg v. Commonwealth
520 A.2d 895 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Commonwealth
670 A.2d 722 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Bank of Guam v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 739 (Federal Claims, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "Except as otherwise provided by law, all . . . bonds, Treasury notes, and other" are omitted as surplus. The words "political subdivision of a State" are substituted for "municipal or local authority" for clarity and consistency. The word "applies" is substituted for "extends" for clarity. The words "directly or indirectly" are omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the word "instead" is substituted for "in lieu" for clarity.
In subsection (b), the words "shares, certificates, stock, or other" and "sale or other" are omitted as surplus. The words "The tax status of . . . and the tax treatment of . . . is decided under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)" are substituted for "shall not have any exemption, as such . . . shall not have any special treatment, as such, except as provided under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954" for clarity. The words "on or after March 28, 1942" and 31:742a(a)(1st sentence words after semicolon related to the United States Maritime Commission) are omitted as executed. The last sentence is substituted for 31:742a(a)(last sentence) for clarity. The words "any political subdivision thereof" are omitted as included in "agency or instrumentality". The text of 31:742a(b) and (c) is omitted as unnecessary.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
In subsection (b), the words "shares, certificates, stock, or other" and "sale or other" are omitted as surplus. The words "The tax status of . . . and the tax treatment of . . . is decided under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)" are substituted for "shall not have any exemption, as such . . . shall not have any special treatment, as such, except as provided under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954" for clarity. The words "on or after March 28, 1942" and 31:742a(a)(1st sentence words after semicolon related to the United States Maritime Commission) are omitted as executed. The last sentence is substituted for 31:742a(a)(last sentence) for clarity. The words "any political subdivision thereof" are omitted as included in "agency or instrumentality". The text of 31:742a(b) and (c) is omitted as unnecessary.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 3124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/3124.