FEDERAL · 30 U.S.C. · Chapter 2
Proceedings for patent where boundaries contain vein or lode; application; statement including vein or lode; issuance of patent: acreage payments for vein or lode and placer claim; costs of proceedings; knowledge affecting construction of application and scope of patent
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Where the same person, association, or corporation is in possession of a placer claim, and also a vein or lode included within the boundaries thereof, application shall be made for a patent for the placer claim, with the statement that it includes such vein or lode, and in such case a patent shall issue for the placer claim, subject to the provisions of sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, including such vein or lode, upon the payment of $5 per acre for such vein or lode claim, and twenty-five feet of surface on each side thereof. The remainder of the placer claim, or any placer claim not embracing any vein or lode claim, shall be paid for at the rate of $2.50 per acre, together with all costs of proceedings; and w
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
30 U.S.C. § 37 (Proceedings for patent where boundaries contain vein or lode; application; statement including vein or lode; issuance of patent: acreage payments for vein or lode and placer claim; costs of proceedings; knowledge affecting construction of application and scope of patent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.
446 U.S. 657 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Marathon Oil Co. v. Lujan
751 F. Supp. 1454 (D. Colorado, 1990)
Bowen v. Sil-Flo Corporation
451 P.2d 626 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1969)
Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation
432 P.2d 435 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1967)
Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation
423 P.2d 104 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)
Tags Realty, LLC v. Runkle
2015 MT 166 (Montana Supreme Court, 2015)
Crofoot v. Hill
326 P.2d 417 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1958)
Stanton v. WEBER
341 P.2d 1078 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
Source Credit
History
(R.S. §2333.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, referred to in text, were in the original "this chapter", meaning chapter 6 of title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2318 to 2352.
Codification
R.S. §2333 derived from act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, §11, 17 Stat. 94.
References in Text
Sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, referred to in text, were in the original "this chapter", meaning chapter 6 of title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2318 to 2352.
Codification
R.S. §2333 derived from act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, §11, 17 Stat. 94.