FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 15
Judicial review
29 U.S.C. § 660
Title29 — Labor
Chapter15 — OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 660 (Judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 660.
Text
(a)Filing of petition by persons adversely affected or aggrieved; orders subject to review; jurisdiction; venue; procedure; conclusiveness of record and findings of Commission; appropriate relief; finality of judgment
Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order of the Commission issued under subsection (c) of section 659 of this title may obtain a review of such order in any United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the violation is alleged to have occurred or where the employer has its principal office, or in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, by filing in such court within sixty days following the issuance of such order a written petition praying that the order be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith transmitt
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
514 U.S. 122 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of Education
711 F.2d 161 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the Secretary of Labor
529 F.2d 649 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor
511 F.2d 864 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.
717 A.2d 811 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Getty Oil Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the United States Department of Labor
530 F.2d 1143 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Titanium Metals Corp. v. Usery
579 F.2d 536 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1802, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,939 Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
607 F.2d 871 (Third Circuit, 1979)
6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2032, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,247 Southern Colorado Prestress Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
586 F.2d 1342 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
9 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1446, 1981 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 25,292 in the Matter of Establishment Inspection of J. R. Simplot Company, a Corporation. J. R. Simplot Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and U. S. Department of Labor
640 F.2d 1134 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
671 F.2d 643 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1347, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,556 United Parcel Service of Ohio, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
570 F.2d 806 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1557, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,565 the Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
623 F.2d 155 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1636, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,814 Greyhound Lines-West, and Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
575 F.2d 759 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Gates & Fox Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
790 F.2d 154 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department of Commerce
962 F.2d 1055 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Reich v. State Credit Inc.
897 F. Supp. 1014 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
Su v. United States Postal Service
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Southwestern Bell v. OSHRC
(Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–596, §11, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1602; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(32), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3360.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provision requiring expeditious hearing of petitions filed under this subsection.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provision requiring expeditious hearing of petitions filed under this subsection.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/660.