FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 23
Exemptions
29 U.S.C. § 2103
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2103 (Exemptions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2103.
Text
This chapter shall not apply to a plant closing or mass layoff if—
(1)the closing is of a temporary facility or the closing or layoff is the result of the completion of a particular project or undertaking, and the affected employees were hired with the understanding that their employment was limited to the duration of the facility or the project or undertaking; or
(2)the closing or layoff constitutes a strike or constitutes a lockout not intended to evade the requirements of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall require an employer to serve written notice pursuant to section 2102(a) of this title when permanently replacing a person who is deemed to be an economic striker under the National Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.]: Provided, That nothing in this chapter shall be
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steven Scott Kildea v. Electro-Wire Products, Inc.
144 F.3d 400 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
Buck v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
75 F.3d 1285 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Marques v. Telles Ranch, Inc.
867 F. Supp. 1438 (N.D. California, 1994)
LOCAL 2-1971 OF PACE INTERNATIONAL UNION v. Cooper
364 F. Supp. 2d 546 (W.D. North Carolina, 2005)
Washington v. Aircap Industries Corp.
831 F. Supp. 1292 (D. South Carolina, 1993)
Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee Ex Rel. Howe v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.
935 F. Supp. 1021 (W.D. Missouri, 1996)
United Mine Workers v. Florence Mining Co.
855 F. Supp. 1466 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)
Bentley v. Arlee Home Fashions, Inc.
861 F. Supp. 65 (E.D. Arkansas, 1994)
United Mine Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Peabody Coal Company
38 F.3d 850 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 7-629, Afl-Cio v. Rmi Titanium Company
199 F.3d 881 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.
792 F. Supp. 1046 (E.D. Michigan, 1992)
Johnson v. TeleSpectrum Worldwide, Inc.
61 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Delaware, 1999)
Buck v. Federal Deposit Insurance
75 F.3d 1285 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Kinney v. Public Consulting Group
(Second Circuit, 2024)
Kinney v. Public Consulting Group, Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 100–379, §4, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 892.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The National Labor Relations Act, referred to in par. (2), is act July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 452, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§151 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 167 of this title and Tables.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
References in Text
The National Labor Relations Act, referred to in par. (2), is act July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 452, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§151 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 167 of this title and Tables.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2103.