FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 22

Prohibitions on lie detector use

29 U.S.C. § 2002
Title29Labor
SubtitleF
Chapter22 — EMPLOYEE POLYGRAPH PROTECTION

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2002 (Prohibitions on lie detector use) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2002.

Text

Except as provided in sections 2006 and 2007 of this title, it shall be unlawful for any employer engaged in or affecting commerce or in the production of goods for commerce—

(1)directly or indirectly, to require, request, suggest, or cause any employee or prospective employee to take or submit to any lie detector test;
(2)to use, accept, refer to, or inquire concerning the results of any lie detector test of any employee or prospective employee;
(3)to discharge, discipline, discriminate against in any manner, or deny employment or promotion to, or threaten to take any such action against—
(A)any employee or prospective employee who refuses, declines, or fails to take or submit to any lie detector test, or
(B)any employee or prospective employee on the basis of the results of any lie

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & Sa
285 F.3d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
1,344 case citations
Hall v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
555 N.E.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
55 case citations
Fernandez v. Mora-San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.
462 F.3d 1244 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
16 case citations
Sabrina Polkey v. Transtecs Corporation
404 F.3d 1264 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
11 case citations
Donald Bass v. Wendy's of Downtown, Inc.
526 F. App'x 599 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
10 case citations
Lyle v. Mercy Hospital Anderson
876 F. Supp. 157 (S.D. Ohio, 1995)
6 case citations
Buerger v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
982 F. Supp. 1247 (E.D. Texas, 1997)
6 case citations
Cummings v. Washington Mutual
650 F.3d 1386 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
6 case citations
James v. Professionals' Detective Agency, Inc.
876 F. Supp. 1013 (N.D. Illinois, 1995)
5 case citations
Wiltshire v. Citibank
171 Misc. 2d 250 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
2 case citations
Sunderlin v. First Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.
235 F. Supp. 2d 222 (W.D. New York, 2002)
2 case citations
Blackwell v. 53rd-Ellis Currency Exchange
852 F. Supp. 646 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
2 case citations
Del Canto v. ITT Sheraton Corp.
865 F. Supp. 927 (District of Columbia, 1994)
1 case citations
Campbell v. Woodard Photographic, Inc.
433 F. Supp. 2d 857 (N.D. Ohio, 2006)
1 case citations
Miguel Clime v. Sunwest PEO
253 F. App'x 805 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
M. G. v. Metropolitan Interpreters & Translators, Inc.
62 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (S.D. California, 2014)
Escalante v. Rapid Armored Corp.
183 Misc. 2d 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Taylor v. EPOC Clinic, Inc.
437 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (M.D. Florida, 2006)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 100–347, §3, June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 646.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after June 27, 1988, except that rules and regulations shall be issued not later than 90 days after June 27, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–347, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2002.