FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
Required coverage for reconstructive surgery following mastectomies
29 U.S.C. § 1185b
Title29 — Labor
SubtitleB
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
PartSubpart B—Other Requirements
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 1185b (Required coverage for reconstructive surgery following mastectomies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 1185b.
Text
(a)In general
A group health plan, and a health insurance issuer providing health insurance coverage in connection with a group health plan, that provides medical and surgical benefits with respect to a mastectomy shall provide, in a case of a participant or beneficiary who is receiving benefits in connection with a mastectomy and who elects breast reconstruction in connection with such mastectomy, coverage for—
(1)all stages of reconstruction of the breast on which the mastectomy has been performed;
(2)surgery and reconstruction of the other breast to produce a symmetrical appearance; and
(3)prostheses and physical complications of mastectomy, including lymphedemas;
in a manner determined in consultation with the attending physician and the patient. Such coverage may be subject to ann
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haag v. MVP Health Care
866 F. Supp. 2d 137 (N.D. New York, 2012)
Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
418 F. Supp. 2d 416 (S.D. New York, 2005)
J.L.F. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System
4 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004)
Howard v. Coventry Health Care, of Iowa, Inc.
293 F.3d 442 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Iwata v. Intel Corp.
349 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
Davidson v. Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan
305 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (S.D. Iowa, 2004)
Shaw v. McFarland Clinic, P.C.
231 F. Supp. 2d 924 (S.D. Iowa, 2002)
Howard v. Coventry Health Care of Iowa, Inc.
158 F. Supp. 2d 937 (S.D. Iowa, 2001)
Evans v. UnitedHealthcare of Oklahoma Inc.
(N.D. Oklahoma, 2021)
Rideau v. Lafayette Health Ventures Inc
(W.D. Louisiana, 2019)
New York Group For Plastic Surgery LLP v. Anthem Blue Cross
(S.D. New York, 2022)
Muth v. Sebelius
856 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (C.D. California, 2012)
ADIRZONE v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
(D. New Jersey, 2025)
Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
517 F.3d 614 (Second Circuit, 2008)
Park Avenue Aesthetic Surgery, P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield
(S.D. New York, 2021)
PRESTIGE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC SURGERY, P.C. v. KEYSTONE HEALTHPLAN EAST
(D. New Jersey, 2020)
TAMBURRINO, M.D. v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC.
(D. New Jersey, 2023)
Howard v. Coventry Health Care
293 F.3d 442 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §713, as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title IX, §902(a)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–436.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title IX, §902(c)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–438, provided that:
"(1) In general.—The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 21, 1998].
"(2) Special rule for collective bargaining agreements.—In the case of a group health plan maintained pursuant to 1 or more collective bargaining agreements between employee representatives and 1 or more employers, any plan amendment made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement relating to the plan which amends the plan solely to conform to any requirement added by this section shall not be treated as a termination of such collective bargaining agreement."
Effective Date
Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title IX, §902(c)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–438, provided that:
"(1) In general.—The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 21, 1998].
"(2) Special rule for collective bargaining agreements.—In the case of a group health plan maintained pursuant to 1 or more collective bargaining agreements between employee representatives and 1 or more employers, any plan amendment made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement relating to the plan which amends the plan solely to conform to any requirement added by this section shall not be treated as a termination of such collective bargaining agreement."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 1185b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/1185b.