FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 57

Tax liability

28 U.S.C. § 960
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter57 — GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO COURT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 960 (Tax liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 960.

Text

(a)Any officers and agents conducting any business under authority of a United States court shall be subject to all Federal, State and local taxes applicable to such business to the same extent as if it were conducted by an individual or corporation.
(b)A tax under subsection (a) shall be paid on or before the due date of the tax under applicable nonbankruptcy law, unless—
(1)the tax is a property tax secured by a lien against property that is abandoned under section 554 of title 11, within a reasonable period of time after the lien attaches, by the trustee in a case under title 11; or
(2)payment of the tax is excused under a specific provision of title 11.
(c)In a case pending under chapter 7 of title 11, payment of a tax may be deferred until final distribution is made under section

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholas v. United States
384 U.S. 678 (Supreme Court, 1966)
246 case citations
California State Board of Equalization v. Sierra Summit, Inc.
490 U.S. 844 (Supreme Court, 1989)
82 case citations
New Jersey v. Reading Co.
101 S. Ct. 1997 (Supreme Court, 1981)
36 case citations
Williams v. United States
667 F.2d 1108 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
8 case citations
Dreyfuss v. Cory (In re Cloobeck)
788 F.3d 1243 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
7 case citations
In Re Shank
240 B.R. 216 (D. Maryland, 1999)
7 case citations
Preston v. United States (In Re 4100 North High Ltd.)
3 B.R. 232 (S.D. Ohio, 1980)
6 case citations
In Re New York, New Haven, and Hartford Railroad Co.
360 F. Supp. 1155 (D. Connecticut, 1973)
6 case citations
Judge v. Diamond (In re Victor Dye Works, Inc.)
48 B.R. 943 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
3 case citations
United States v. City of Roanoke
258 F. Supp. 415 (W.D. Virginia, 1966)
3 case citations
In re Hatfield Construction Co.
361 F. Supp. 468 (M.D. Georgia, 1973)
2 case citations
In re Sapphire Steamship
38 B.R. 155 (S.D. New York, 1984)
1 case citations
Olsen v. Deutscher
731 F.2d 376 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
1 case citations
Great American Bank v. McCracken
750 F.2d 887 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 927; Pub. L. 109–8, title VII, §712(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 127.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §124a (June 18, 1934, ch. 585, 48 Stat. 993).
A proviso in section 124a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to taxes accruing prior to the effective date of the 1934 act, was omitted as obsolete.
References in section 124a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., to specific officers was omitted as covered by the words "Any officers."
Word "Federal" was added before "State" in recognition of the liability of such officers for Federal taxes under the revenue laws.
Changes in phraseology were made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2005—Pub. L. 109–8 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 11.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/960.