FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
Arizona
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Arizona constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 82 (Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison
618 F.2d 530 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Connor v. Real Title Corp.
165 F.2d 291 (Fourth Circuit, 1947)
John Ippolito v. United States
223 F.2d 154 (Fifth Circuit, 1955)
Jennings v. Southern Ry. Co.
40 F.2d 951 (E.D. South Carolina, 1930)
Stembridge v. Greyhound Lines Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2025)
Watson v. Peck
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
Halloum v. United States Air Force
(S.D. New York, 2023)
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Mark Gutierrez
(C.D. California, 2021)
(PC) Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
(E.D. California, 2023)
McClain Jr. v. United States
(D. New Mexico, 2022)
United States v. Roger Bitsinnie
680 F. App'x 574 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Stembridge v. Greyhound Lines Incorporated
(D. Arizona, 2025)
Cole v. Arizona Department of Child Safety
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Smith v. Vella
(S.D. New York, 2023)
SILVA DOMINGUEZ v. WASHBURN
(M.D. Georgia, 2023)
Pearce v. United States
(E.D. North Carolina, 2023)
Wallace v. Bradley
(D. Hawaii, 2024)
Parmentier v. United States of America
(D. New Mexico, 2022)
Jimenez v. United States
(D. New Mexico, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 874; Pub. L. 116–40, §1, Aug. 9, 2019, 133 Stat. 1063.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §143 (June 20, 1910, ch. 310, §31, 36 Stat. 576; Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 17, §§1, 2, 38 Stat. 203).
A provision for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place for holding court to another was omitted. Such provision, as to civil cases, is covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, is rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.
A provision for making an interlocutory order at any place designated for holding court was omitted as unnecessary in view of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 77(b).
A provision requiring the clerk to keep his office at the State capital was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2019—Pub. L. 116–40 substituted "Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma" for "Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson".
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §143 (June 20, 1910, ch. 310, §31, 36 Stat. 576; Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 17, §§1, 2, 38 Stat. 203).
A provision for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place for holding court to another was omitted. Such provision, as to civil cases, is covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, is rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.
A provision for making an interlocutory order at any place designated for holding court was omitted as unnecessary in view of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 77(b).
A provision requiring the clerk to keep his office at the State capital was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2019—Pub. L. 116–40 substituted "Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma" for "Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson".