FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 15
Institutes and joint councils on sentencing
28 U.S.C. § 334
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter15 — CONFERENCES AND COUNCILS OF JUDGES
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 334 (Institutes and joint councils on sentencing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 334.
Text
(a)In the interest of uniformity in sentencing procedures, there is hereby authorized to be established under the auspices of the Judicial Conference of the United States, institutes and joint councils on sentencing. The Attorney General and/or the chief judge of each circuit may at any time request, through the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Judicial Conference to convene such institutes and joint councils for the purpose of studying, discussing, and formulating the objectives, policies, standards, and criteria for sentencing those convicted of crimes and offenses in the courts of the United States. The agenda of the institutes and joint councils may include but shall not be limited to:
(1)The development of standards for the content and utilizati
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mistretta v. United States
488 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Corey v. United States
375 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Jesus Rivera v. United States
318 F.2d 606 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez
857 F.2d 1245 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
William R. Leach v. United States
334 F.2d 945 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
William H. Leach v. United States
320 F.2d 670 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
William Herbert Jones v. United States
419 F.2d 593 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
Perkins v. State of North Carolina
234 F. Supp. 333 (W.D. North Carolina, 1964)
United States v. Alves
688 F. Supp. 70 (D. Massachusetts, 1988)
United States v. Mendez
691 F. Supp. 656 (S.D. New York, 1988)
United States v. Silvernail
1 M.J. 945 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Myers
687 F. Supp. 1403 (N.D. California, 1988)
Brandt v. Trivest II, Inc. (In Re Plassein International Corp.)
352 B.R. 36 (D. Delaware, 2006)
JJCC Real Estate LLC v. Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC (In re Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC)
556 B.R. 68 (E.D. New York, 2016)
United States v. Somohano
193 F. Supp. 201 (D. Connecticut, 1961)
Pievsky v. Ridge
921 F. Supp. 1335 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
The Bank of New York Mellon v. 251 Gotham LLC
(S.D. Alabama, 2019)
United States v. William H. Jackson
542 F.2d 162 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Brandon v. Sherwood (In re Sann)
546 B.R. 840 (D. Montana, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 85–752, §1, Aug. 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 845.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Sentencing Procedures
Pub. L. 85–752, §7, Aug. 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 847, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section, sections 4208 and 4209 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and provisions set out as a note under section 4208 of Title 18] does not apply to any offense for which there is provided a mandatory penalty."
Sentencing Procedures
Pub. L. 85–752, §7, Aug. 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 847, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section, sections 4208 and 4209 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and provisions set out as a note under section 4208 of Title 18] does not apply to any offense for which there is provided a mandatory penalty."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/334.