FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 161
Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance
28 U.S.C. § 2406
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter161 — UNITED STATES AS PARTY GENERALLY
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2406 (Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2406.
Text
In an action by the United States against an individual, evidence supporting the defendant's claim for a credit shall not be admitted unless he first proves that such claim has been disallowed, in whole or in part, by the Government Accountability Office, or that he has, at the time of the trial, obtained possession of vouchers not previously procurable and has been prevented from presenting such claim to the Government Accountability Office by absence from the United States or unavoidable accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
National City Bank of NY v. Republic of China
348 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 1955)
Wallace G. Frederick v. United States
386 F.2d 481 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Howard B. Quinn
419 F.2d 1014 (Seventh Circuit, 1969)
Lawrence v. United States
378 F.2d 452 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.
881 F. Supp. 1432 (E.D. California, 1995)
United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.
134 F. Supp. 898 (E.D. Arkansas, 1955)
Lowell O. West Lumber Sales, a Corporation v. United States
270 F.2d 12 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Deseret Apartments, Inc. v. United States
250 F.2d 457 (Tenth Circuit, 1957)
United States v. King
119 F. Supp. 398 (D. Alaska, 1954)
Amerada Hess Corporation v. Department of Interior
170 F.3d 1032 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Frank
207 F. Supp. 216 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Ruppenthal v. State Ex Rel. Economic Development & Stabilization Board
849 P.2d 1316 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Ameco Electronic Corporation
224 F. Supp. 783 (E.D. New York, 1963)
United States v. Taylor
342 F. Supp. 715 (D. Kansas, 1972)
United States v. Double Bend Mfg. Co.
114 F. Supp. 750 (S.D. New York, 1953)
United States v. Paddock
187 F.2d 271 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)
United States v. Timber Access Industries Co.
54 F.R.D. 36 (D. Oregon, 1971)
United States v. Lashlee
105 F. Supp. 184 (W.D. Arkansas, 1952)
United States v. Anasae International Corporation
197 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. New York, 1961)
United States v. Finn
127 F. Supp. 158 (S.D. California, 1954)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 972; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §774 (R.S., §§236, 951; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §§304, 305, 42 Stat. 24).
Word "action" was substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Section 774 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided that "no claim for a credit shall be admitted, upon trial", etc. This was changed to "evidence supporting the defendant's claim for a credit shall not be admitted", to clarify the meaning of the section. The case of U.S. v. Heard, D.C.Va. 1940, 32 F.Supp. 39, reviews the conflicting decisions on the question whether compliance with the section must be pleaded, and offers persuasive argument that it need not be, and that the section was designed as a rule of evidence. The wording of the remainder of the section also supports this conclusion, as pointed out by Judge Learned Hand in U.S. v. Standard Aircraft Corp., D.C.N.Y. 1926, 16 F.2d 307, followed in the Heard case.
Changes in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §774 (R.S., §§236, 951; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §§304, 305, 42 Stat. 24).
Word "action" was substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Section 774 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided that "no claim for a credit shall be admitted, upon trial", etc. This was changed to "evidence supporting the defendant's claim for a credit shall not be admitted", to clarify the meaning of the section. The case of U.S. v. Heard, D.C.Va. 1940, 32 F.Supp. 39, reviews the conflicting decisions on the question whether compliance with the section must be pleaded, and offers persuasive argument that it need not be, and that the section was designed as a rule of evidence. The wording of the remainder of the section also supports this conclusion, as pointed out by Judge Learned Hand in U.S. v. Standard Aircraft Corp., D.C.N.Y. 1926, 16 F.2d 307, followed in the Heard case.
Changes in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2406.