FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 154
Prisoners in State custody subject to capital sentence; appointment of counsel; requirement of rule of court or statute; procedures for appointment
28 U.S.C. § 2261
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter154 — SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2261 (Prisoners in State custody subject to capital sentence; appointment of counsel; requirement of rule of court or statute; procedures for appointment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2261.
Text
(a)This chapter shall apply to cases arising under section 2254 brought by prisoners in State custody who are subject to a capital sentence. It shall apply only if the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) are satisfied.
(b)Counsel.—This chapter is applicable if—
(1)the Attorney General of the United States certifies that a State has established a mechanism for providing counsel in postconviction proceedings as provided in section 2265; and
(2)counsel was appointed pursuant to that mechanism, petitioner validly waived counsel, petitioner retained counsel, or petitioner was found not to be indigent.
(c)Any mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and reimbursement of counsel as provided in subsection (b) must offer counsel to all State prisoners under capital sentence and must prov
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duncan v. Walker
533 U.S. 167 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Calderon v. Ashmus
523 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Ignacio Alberto ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent-Appellee
149 F.3d 923 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Moore v. Gibson
195 F.3d 1152 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Richard H. Austin v. Ricky Bell, Warden
126 F.3d 843 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
Jackery B. White v. Robert Klitzkie
281 F.3d 920 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Peter T. EDELBACHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
160 F.3d 582 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
George B. Harris v. Michael Bowersox State of Missouri
184 F.3d 744 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Jimmy Ray Pitsonbarger v. Richard Gramley
141 F.3d 728 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Timothy Lanier Allen v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
366 F.3d 319 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Marilynn R. Malcom v. Alice Payne
281 F.3d 951 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
John W. Duvall v. Dan Reynolds
131 F.3d 907 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
122 F.3d 720 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Alfred R. DYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
113 F.3d 927 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Mackall v. Murray
109 F.3d 957 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Anthony Marshall Spears v. Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Opinion
267 F.3d 1026 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Spears v. Stewart
283 F.3d 992 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Warren v. Milyard
427 F. App'x 670 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
Dennis Skillicorn v. Al Luebbers
265 F.3d 687 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1221; amended Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(a), (b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, §507(a), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "This chapter is applicable if a State establishes by statute, rule of its court of last resort, or by another agency authorized by State law, a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State post-conviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners whose capital convictions and sentences have been upheld on direct appeal to the court of last resort in the State or have otherwise become final for State law purposes. The rule of court or statute must provide standards of competency for the appointment of such counsel."
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–177, §507(b), struck out "or on direct appeal" after "at trial".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2006 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–177 applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as a note under section 2251 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(c), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1226, provided that: "Chapter 154 of title 28, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to cases pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]."
Amendments
2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, §507(a), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "This chapter is applicable if a State establishes by statute, rule of its court of last resort, or by another agency authorized by State law, a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State post-conviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners whose capital convictions and sentences have been upheld on direct appeal to the court of last resort in the State or have otherwise become final for State law purposes. The rule of court or statute must provide standards of competency for the appointment of such counsel."
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–177, §507(b), struck out "or on direct appeal" after "at trial".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2006 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–177 applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as a note under section 2251 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(c), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1226, provided that: "Chapter 154 of title 28, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to cases pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2261.