FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 154

Certification and judicial review

28 U.S.C. § 2265
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter154 — SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2265 (Certification and judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2265.

Text

(a)Certification.—
(1)In general.—If requested by an appropriate State official, the Attorney General of the United States shall determine—
(A)whether the State has established a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State postconviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners who have been sentenced to death;
(B)the date on which the mechanism described in subparagraph (A) was established; and
(C)whether the State provides standards of competency for the appointment of counsel in proceedings described in subparagraph (A).
(2)Effective date.—The date the mechanism described in paragraph (1)(A) was established shall be the effective date of the certification under this subsection.
(3)Only express requireme

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. United States
417 U.S. 333 (Supreme Court, 1974)
1,728 case citations
Withrow v. Williams
507 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1993)
644 case citations
Calderon v. Ashmus
523 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1998)
339 case citations
United States v. Mark Hirsch Horodner
993 F.2d 191 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
96 case citations
Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
211 F.3d 1148 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
96 case citations
United States v. Thilo Brown
868 F.3d 297 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
88 case citations
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
53 case citations
United States v. Taylor
672 F. App'x 860 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
21 case citations
Ashmus v. Calderon
123 F.3d 1199 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
19 case citations
Rodriguez v. United States
679 F. App'x 41 (Second Circuit, 2017)
15 case citations
United States v. Gill
673 F. Supp. 275 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
8 case citations
Ernest Clark v. United States
680 F. App'x 470 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
8 case citations
State v. Corey D. Young and Marco A. Rios-Lopez
406 P.3d 868 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2017)
6 case citations
United States v. Watkins
912 F. Supp. 417 (E.D. Arkansas, 1996)
3 case citations
United States v. Rutigliano Lesniewski v. United States
694 F. App'x 19 (Second Circuit, 2017)
3 case citations
United States v. Tuyen Vu Ngo
700 F. App'x 806 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 2265, added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223, related to the application of sections 2262, 2263, 2264, and 2266 of this title to State unitary review procedures, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 2251 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2265.