FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 154
Certification and judicial review
28 U.S.C. § 2265
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter154 — SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2265 (Certification and judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2265.
Text
(a)Certification.—
(1)In general.—If requested by an appropriate State official, the Attorney General of the United States shall determine—
(A)whether the State has established a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State postconviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners who have been sentenced to death;
(B)the date on which the mechanism described in subparagraph (A) was established; and
(C)whether the State provides standards of competency for the appointment of counsel in proceedings described in subparagraph (A).
(2)Effective date.—The date the mechanism described in paragraph (1)(A) was established shall be the effective date of the certification under this subsection.
(3)Only express requireme
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. United States
417 U.S. 333 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Withrow v. Williams
507 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Orville Cephas v. John Nash, Warden, Ray Brook Federal Correctional Institution
328 F.3d 98 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Calderon v. Ashmus
523 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Mark Hirsch Horodner
993 F.2d 191 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
211 F.3d 1148 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Thilo Brown
868 F.3d 297 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Carlos Pagan San-Miguel v. Dan L. Dove, Warden of Fci-Edgefield United States of America, Calvin Tyrone Young v. Joyce K. Conley, Warden
291 F.3d 257 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Taylor
672 F. App'x 860 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Ashmus v. Calderon
123 F.3d 1199 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
202 F.3d 1160 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Rodriguez v. United States
679 F. App'x 41 (Second Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Gill
673 F. Supp. 275 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Ernest Clark v. United States
680 F. App'x 470 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
State v. Corey D. Young and Marco A. Rios-Lopez
406 P.3d 868 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2017)
United States v. Watkins
912 F. Supp. 417 (E.D. Arkansas, 1996)
Anthony Marshall Spears v. Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Opinion
267 F.3d 1026 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Rutigliano Lesniewski v. United States
694 F. App'x 19 (Second Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Tuyen Vu Ngo
700 F. App'x 806 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 2265, added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223, related to the application of sections 2262, 2263, 2264, and 2266 of this title to State unitary review procedures, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 2251 of this title.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 2265, added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223, related to the application of sections 2262, 2263, 2264, and 2266 of this title to State unitary review procedures, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 2251 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2265.