FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153
Certificate of trial judge admissible in evidence
28 U.S.C. § 2245
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter153 — HABEAS CORPUS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2245 (Certificate of trial judge admissible in evidence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2245.
Text
On the hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the legality of the detention of a person pursuant to a judgment the certificate of the judge who presided at the trial resulting in the judgment, setting forth the facts occurring at the trial, shall be admissible in evidence. Copies of the certificate shall be filed with the court in which the application is pending and in the court in which the trial took place.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Townsend v. Sain
372 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Brown v. Allen
344 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1953)
Cortez Miller v. Dennis M. Straub, Warden, Kermit Eldridge Haynes v. Luella Burke, Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility
299 F.3d 570 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
Herbert Russell Bassette v. Charles E. Thompson, Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General of Virginia
915 F.2d 932 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
714 F.2d 365 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Newland v. Hall
527 F.3d 1162 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Norton v. Spencer
351 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2003)
Franklin D. Strader v. Anthony F. Troy, Attorney General of Virginia, and Commonwealth of Virginia
571 F.2d 1263 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Jennings v. Illinois
342 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Jack E. Alderman v. Sam Austin, Warden, Georgia State Prison
695 F.2d 124 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Jonathan Green v. Rick Thaler, Director
699 F.3d 404 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Bradley Register v. Rick Thaler, Director
681 F.3d 623 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Jessica Tavares v. Gene Whitehouse
851 F.3d 863 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Williams v. Thurmer
561 F.3d 740 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
Ryan Hung-Ping Wang v. William Withworth Lincoln Stokes Anthony J. Celebrezze, Respondents
811 F.2d 952 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Dashawn Lyons v. Andrew Jackson, Warden
299 F.3d 588 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
Commonwealth ex rel. Fairman v. Cavell
222 A.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Randall Weidner v. James H. Thieret, Warden, Menard Correctional Facility, and Roland W. Burris, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
932 F.2d 626 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
Brooks Lee Anderson v. Wilburn C. Johnson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
371 F.2d 84 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)
Shear v. Boles
263 F. Supp. 855 (N.D. West Virginia, 1967)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 966.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
This section makes no substantive change in existing law. It is derived from H.R. 4232 introduced in the first session of the Seventy-ninth Congress by Chairman Sumners of the House Committee on the Judiciary. It clarifies existing law and promotes uniform procedure.
This section makes no substantive change in existing law. It is derived from H.R. 4232 introduced in the first session of the Seventy-ninth Congress by Chairman Sumners of the House Committee on the Judiciary. It clarifies existing law and promotes uniform procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2245.