FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 133
Harmless error
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
On the hearing of any appeal or writ of certiorari in any case, the court shall give judgment after an examination of the record without regard to errors or defects which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 2111 (Harmless error) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Richard Junior Frazier
387 F.3d 1244 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Harris v. State
790 S.W.2d 568 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Preciado, AKA Tony Rodriguez-Preciado
399 F.3d 1118 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Rude
88 F.3d 1538 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Paul R. Forrest v. Beloit Corporation Harnischfeger Industries, Inc
424 F.3d 344 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Ellis v. City of Chicago
667 F.2d 606 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
Munoz v. Strahm Farms, Inc.
69 F.3d 501 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Evans v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.
315 F.2d 335 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Martel v. County of Los Angeles
21 F.3d 940 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
State v. Lawrence
167 N.W.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1969)
Whittier v. Emmet
281 F.2d 24 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)
CNA Insurance v. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co.
747 F.3d 339 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Mack Al Green v. United States
262 F.3d 715 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Loeb Industries, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.
306 F.3d 469 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
Menegassi v. Shinseki
638 F.3d 1379 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Degelos v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
313 F.2d 809 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. State of Arizona
206 F.2d 159 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Erika Olund v. Russell L. Swarthout
459 F.2d 999 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Brian Charette
893 F.3d 1169 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Knight
96 F.3d 1284 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Added May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §110, 63 Stat. 105.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
1949 Act
Incorporates in title 28, U.S.C., as section 2111 thereof, the harmless error provisions of section 269 of the Judicial Code (now repealed), which applied to all courts of the United States and to all cases therein and therefore was superseded only in part by the Federal Procedural Rules, which apply only to the United States district courts.
1949 Act
Incorporates in title 28, U.S.C., as section 2111 thereof, the harmless error provisions of section 269 of the Judicial Code (now repealed), which applied to all courts of the United States and to all cases therein and therefore was superseded only in part by the Federal Procedural Rules, which apply only to the United States district courts.