FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 121

Declaration of policy

28 U.S.C. § 1861
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter121 — JURIES; TRIAL BY JURY

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Declaration of policy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1861.

Text

It is the policy of the United States that all litigants in Federal courts entitled to trial by jury shall have the right to grand and petit juries selected at random from a fair cross section of the community in the district or division wherein the court convenes. It is further the policy of the United States that all citizens shall have the opportunity to be considered for service on grand and petit juries in the district courts of the United States, and shall have an obligation to serve as jurors when summoned for that purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Louisiana
419 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1975)
2,420 case citations
Rabinowitz v. United States
366 F.2d 34 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
152 case citations
Morro v. City of Birmingham
117 F.3d 508 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
130 case citations
United States v. Crawford
15 C.M.A. 31 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)
93 case citations
United States v. Meredith
824 F.2d 1418 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
76 case citations
Eugene Anthony Nolan v. United States
423 F.2d 1031 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
56 case citations
United States v. Erickson
75 F.3d 470 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
53 case citations
United States v. Leslie B. Ponder, Jr.
444 F.2d 816 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
48 case citations
United States v. Caci
401 F.2d 664 (Second Circuit, 1968)
43 case citations
United States v. Schneider
111 F.3d 197 (First Circuit, 1997)
43 case citations
United States v. Alfred Whiting
538 F.2d 220 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
39 case citations
United States v. Ramirez
884 F.2d 1524 (First Circuit, 1989)
31 case citations
Dan Witcher v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
405 F.2d 725 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
29 case citations
United States ex rel. Flemings v. Chafee
330 F. Supp. 193 (E.D. New York, 1971)
27 case citations
Ralph Hubert Houston, Jr. v. United States
419 F.2d 30 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
21 case citations
United States v. Cohen
275 F. Supp. 724 (D. Maryland, 1967)
21 case citations
United States v. Hanson
618 F.2d 1261 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
19 case citations
United States v. Rod Blagojevich
614 F.3d 287 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
11 case citations
United States v. Long
88 F.R.D. 701 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
10 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 85–315, part V, §152, Sept. 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 638; Pub. L. 90–274, §101, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 54.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§411 and 415 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§275, 278, 38 Stat. 1164, 1165).
The revised section prescribes uniform standards of qualification for jurors in Federal Courts instead of making qualifications depend upon State laws. This is in accord with proposed legislation recommended by the Judicial Conference of the United States.
The last paragraph is added to exclude jurors incompetent to serve as jurors in State courts.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1968—Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions declaring the policy of the United States with respect to trial by jury and the opportunity to serve on such juries for provisions setting out the required qualifications of Federal jurors, including age, citizenship, residence, freedom from conviction of certain crimes, ability to read, write, speak, and understand the English language, and capability of rendering efficient jury service.
1957—Pub. L. 85–315 substituted "Qualifications of Federal jurors" for "Qualifications" in section catchline.
Pub. L. 85–315 substituted "and who has resided for a period of one year within the judicial district" for "and resides within the judicial district", and struck out provisions which prohibited service as a grand or petit juror if a person was incompetent to serve as a grand or petit juror by the law of the State in which the district court is held.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Pub. L. 90–274, §104, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 63, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and sections 1821, 1862 to 1869, and 1871 of this title, repealing section 867 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section] shall become effective two hundred and seventy days after the date of enactment [Mar. 27, 1968]: Provided, That this Act shall not apply in any case in which an indictment has been returned or petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date."

Short Title of 1978 Amendment
Pub. L. 95–572, §1, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2453, provided that: "This Act [enacting sections 1363 and 1875 of this title, amending sections 1863, 1865, 1866, 1869, and 1871 of this title, renumbering section 1363 (relating to construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress) as section 1364 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1363 of this title] may be cited as the 'Jury System Improvements Act of 1978'."

Short Title
Pub. L. 90–274, §1, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 53, provided: "That this Act [amending this section and sections 1821, 1862 to 1869, and 1871 of this title, repealing section 867 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section] may be cited as the 'Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968'."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1861.