FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 115
Handwriting
28 U.S.C. § 1731
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter115 — EVIDENCE; DOCUMENTARY
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1731 (Handwriting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1731.
Text
The admitted or proved handwriting of any person shall be admissible, for purposes of comparison, to determine genuineness of other handwriting attributed to such person.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Kathleen Kremser Jones
107 F.3d 1147 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Frank Mangan and Kevin Mangan
575 F.2d 32 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Robert L. Strauss v. United States
311 F.2d 926 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Lamont S. Carter, United States of America v. Jerome R. Patterson, United States of America v. Jerome R. Patterson
522 F.2d 666 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.
433 F.2d 174 (Third Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Harold Lloyd Phillips
869 F.2d 1361 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.
926 F.3d 761 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
National Labor Relations Board v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.
298 F.2d 176 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Kennedy v. Lynd
306 F.2d 222 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Billy Dean White
444 F.2d 1274 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Clifford, Russell
704 F.2d 86 (Third Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Keene
341 F.3d 78 (First Circuit, 2003)
Elmer Joseph Scharfenberger, Cross-Appellee v. John W. Wingo and Jerry L. Wilson, Cross-Appellants
542 F.2d 328 (Sixth Circuit, 1976)
Norwest Financial Consumer Discount Co. v. Koch (In Re Koch)
83 B.R. 898 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Homer Jefferson French v. United States
232 F.2d 736 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Wayne M. Greiser, United States of America v. Roderick J. Monte, Jr.
502 F.2d 1295 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Jesse Earl Miller v. United States of America, Robert Holland v. United States
410 F.2d 1290 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
State v. Clark
552 S.W.2d 256 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
Schuyler v. United Air Lines, Inc.
94 F. Supp. 472 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
United States v. Donald Swan
396 F.2d 883 (Second Circuit, 1968)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §638 (Feb. 26, 1913, ch. 79, 37 Stat. 683).
Words "as a basis for comparison by witnesses, or by the jury, court, or officer conducting such proceeding", were omitted as superfluous.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §638 (Feb. 26, 1913, ch. 79, 37 Stat. 683).
Words "as a basis for comparison by witnesses, or by the jury, court, or officer conducting such proceeding", were omitted as superfluous.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1731.