FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Senate actions

28 U.S.C. § 1365
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1365 (Senate actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1365.

Text

(a)The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have original jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy, over any civil action brought by the Senate or any authorized committee or subcommittee of the Senate to enforce, to secure a declaratory judgment concerning the validity of, or to prevent a threatened refusal or failure to comply with, any subpena or order issued by the Senate or committee or subcommittee of the Senate to any entity acting or purporting to act under color or authority of State law or to any natural person to secure the production of documents or other materials of any kind or the answering of any deposition or interrogatory or to secure testimony or any combination thereof. This section shall not apply to an action to enforce, to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Peterson v. Ebke
303 Neb. 637 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
128 case citations
COMMITTEE ON JUD., US HOUSE OF REPRES. v. Miers
558 F. Supp. 2d 53 (District of Columbia, 2008)
49 case citations
Publicker Industries Inc. v. United States (In re Cuyahoga Equipment Corp.)
980 F.2d 110 (Second Circuit, 1992)
40 case citations
In Re SEALED MOTION
880 F.2d 1367 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
32 case citations
United States v. Morita
74 M.J. 116 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2015)
30 case citations
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. City of West Sacramento
905 F. Supp. 792 (E.D. California, 1995)
20 case citations
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, United States House of Representatives v. Holder
979 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2013)
16 case citations
Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations v. Carl Ferrer
856 F.3d 1080 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
15 case citations
Senate Select Committee on Ethics v. Packwood
845 F. Supp. 17 (District of Columbia, 1994)
11 case citations
Gusler v. Fischer
580 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D. New York, 2008)
10 case citations
Lang v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
274 F.R.D. 175 (D. Maryland, 2011)
9 case citations
Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.
55 F. Supp. 3d 43 (District of Columbia, 2014)
8 case citations
Piedra v. Mentor Graphics Corp.
979 F. Supp. 1297 (D. Oregon, 1997)
2 case citations
United States v. $1,399,313.74 in United States Currency
613 F. Supp. 2d 433 (S.D. New York, 2009)
2 case citations
In Re Cuyahoga Equipment Corporation
980 F.2d 110 (Second Circuit, 1992)
1 case citations
Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
973 F.3d 121 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
1 case citations
Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations v. Ferrer
199 F. Supp. 3d 125 (District of Columbia, 2016)
1 case citations
Olteanu v. Schneider
(D. Nevada, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §705(f)(1), Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1879, §1364; amended Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(29)(D), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359; renumbered §1365, Pub. L. 99–336, §6(a)(1)(B), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 638; Pub. L. 104–292, §4, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3460.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–292 substituted "executive branch of the Federal Government acting within his or her official capacity, except that this section shall apply if the refusal to comply is based on the assertion of a personal privilege or objection and is not based on a governmental privilege or objection the assertion of which has been authorized by the executive branch of the Federal Government" for "Federal Government acting within his official capacity".
1984—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out subsec. (c) which provided that in any civil action or contempt proceeding brought pursuant to this section, the court had to assign the action or proceeding for hearing at the earliest practicable date and cause the action or proceeding in every way to be expedited, and that any appeal or petition for review from any order or judgment in such action or proceeding had to be expedited in the same manner.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of Title 2, The Congress.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1365.