FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Election disputes

28 U.S.C. § 1344
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1344 (Election disputes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1344.

Text

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action to recover possession of any office, except that of elector of President or Vice President, United States Senator, Representative in or delegate to Congress, or member of a state legislature, authorized by law to be commenced, where in it appears that the sole question touching the title to office arises out of denial of the right to vote, to any citizen offering to vote, on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude. The jurisdiction under this section shall extend only so far as to determine the rights of the parties to office by reason of the denial of the right, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and secured by any law, to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powell v. McCormack
395 U.S. 486 (Supreme Court, 1969)
2,981 case citations
Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
405 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1972)
643 case citations
Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormick
570 F.2d 1065 (First Circuit, 1978)
207 case citations
Adams v. Zarnel
619 F.3d 156 (Second Circuit, 2010)
144 case citations
Hobson v. Hansen
265 F. Supp. 902 (District of Columbia, 1967)
47 case citations
Hubbard v. Ammerman
465 F.2d 1169 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
32 case citations
Gehlhausen v. Olinger (In Re Olinger)
160 B.R. 1004 (S.D. Indiana, 1993)
29 case citations
Manuel Welch v. Lillie v. McKenzie
765 F.2d 1311 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
28 case citations
Matter of Finkbine
94 B.R. 461 (S.D. Ohio, 1988)
16 case citations
Billie Keyes v. Philip Gunn
890 F.3d 232 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
12 case citations
Gray v. Main
309 F. Supp. 207 (M.D. Alabama, 1968)
11 case citations
Consumer Party v. Tucker
364 F. Supp. 594 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
11 case citations
In Re Mercher's Enterprises, Inc.
387 B.R. 681 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)
11 case citations
In Re International Administrative Services, Inc.
211 B.R. 88 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
8 case citations
Freeman v. Freeman (In Re Freeman)
165 B.R. 307 (S.D. Florida, 1994)
8 case citations
In Re American Paper Mills of Vermont, Inc.
322 B.R. 84 (D. Vermont, 2004)
5 case citations
Keyes v. Gunn
230 F. Supp. 3d 588 (S.D. Mississippi, 2017)
2 case citations
In Re Maldonado
62 B.R. 594 (S.D. New York, 1986)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 932.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(15) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 15, 36 Stat. 1092).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "United States Senator" were added, as no reason appears for including Representatives and excluding Senators. Moreover, the Seventeenth amendment, providing for the popular election of Senators, was adopted after the passage of the 1911 law on which this section is based.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1344.