FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Election disputes
28 U.S.C. § 1344
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1344 (Election disputes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1344.
Text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action to recover possession of any office, except that of elector of President or Vice President, United States Senator, Representative in or delegate to Congress, or member of a state legislature, authorized by law to be commenced, where in it appears that the sole question touching the title to office arises out of denial of the right to vote, to any citizen offering to vote, on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude.
The jurisdiction under this section shall extend only so far as to determine the rights of the parties to office by reason of the denial of the right, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and secured by any law, to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Powell v. McCormack
395 U.S. 486 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
405 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormick
570 F.2d 1065 (First Circuit, 1978)
Adams v. Zarnel
619 F.3d 156 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Hobson v. Hansen
265 F. Supp. 902 (District of Columbia, 1967)
Hubbard v. Ammerman
465 F.2d 1169 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Gehlhausen v. Olinger (In Re Olinger)
160 B.R. 1004 (S.D. Indiana, 1993)
Manuel Welch v. Lillie v. McKenzie
765 F.2d 1311 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. v. John W. McCormack Speaker of the House of Representatives
395 F.2d 577 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Matter of Finkbine
94 B.R. 461 (S.D. Ohio, 1988)
Billie Keyes v. Philip Gunn
890 F.3d 232 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
Gray v. Main
309 F. Supp. 207 (M.D. Alabama, 1968)
Consumer Party v. Tucker
364 F. Supp. 594 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
In Re Mercher's Enterprises, Inc.
387 B.R. 681 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)
Parkview Adventist Medical Center v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Health & Human Services
842 F.3d 757 (First Circuit, 2016)
In Re International Administrative Services, Inc.
211 B.R. 88 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
Freeman v. Freeman (In Re Freeman)
165 B.R. 307 (S.D. Florida, 1994)
In Re American Paper Mills of Vermont, Inc.
322 B.R. 84 (D. Vermont, 2004)
Keyes v. Gunn
230 F. Supp. 3d 588 (S.D. Mississippi, 2017)
In Re Maldonado
62 B.R. 594 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 932.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(15) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 15, 36 Stat. 1092).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "United States Senator" were added, as no reason appears for including Representatives and excluding Senators. Moreover, the Seventeenth amendment, providing for the popular election of Senators, was adopted after the passage of the 1911 law on which this section is based.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(15) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 15, 36 Stat. 1092).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "United States Senator" were added, as no reason appears for including Representatives and excluding Senators. Moreover, the Seventeenth amendment, providing for the popular election of Senators, was adopted after the passage of the 1911 law on which this section is based.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1344.