FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5

Montana

28 U.S.C. § 106

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 106 (Montana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 106.

Text

Montana, exclusive of Yellowstone National Park, constitutes one judicial district. Court shall be held at Billings, Butte, Glasgow, Great Falls, Havre, Helena, Kalispell, Lewistown, Livingston, Miles City, and Missoula.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lesser v. A-Z Associates (In Re Lion Capital Group)
46 B.R. 850 (S.D. New York, 1985)
112 case citations
State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Volpe
479 F.2d 1099 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
82 case citations
Meacham Corp. v. United States
207 F.2d 535 (Fourth Circuit, 1953)
22 case citations
Vagneur v. City of Aspen
2013 CO 13 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2013)
9 case citations
Fogel v. Department of Defense
169 F. Supp. 2d 140 (E.D. New York, 2001)
8 case citations
Samuels v. United States
63 F.2d 638 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
6 case citations
Abcug v. State of Montana
(D. Montana, 2020)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 884.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §172 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §92, 36 Stat. 1118; July 3, 1926, ch. 748, 44 Stat. 825; July 5, 1937, ch. 430, 50 Stat. 474; Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 819, §2, 50 Stat. 837; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 506, 53 Stat. 1236).
All of Yellowstone National Park is included in the judicial district of Wyoming by section 131 of this title. Those parts of the park lying in Montana are accordingly excluded from the judicial district of Montana.
A provision for furnishing rooms and accommodations at Havre was omitted as obsolete on advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available there.
A provision for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place of holding court to another was omitted. Such provision, as to civil cases, is covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, is rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.
A provision for the making of any interlocutory order at any place designated for holding court was omitted as unnecessary in view of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 77–(b).
The provisions respecting court accommodations at Kalispell, Lewistown, and Livingston were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/106.