FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter 71
Provisions of special application to transferees
26 U.S.C. § 6902
Title26 — Internal Revenue Code
Chapter71 — TRANSFEREES AND FIDUCIARIES
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 6902 (Provisions of special application to transferees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 6902.
Text
(a)Burden of proof
In proceedings before the Tax Court the burden of proof shall be upon the Secretary to show that a petitioner is liable as a transferee of property of a taxpayer, but not to show that the taxpayer was liable for the tax.
(b)Evidence
Upon application to the Tax Court, a transferee of property of a taxpayer shall be entitled, under rules prescribed by the Tax Court, to a preliminary examination of books, papers, documents, correspondence, and other evidence of the taxpayer or a preceding transferee of the taxpayer's property, if the transferee making the application is a petitioner before the Tax Court for the redetermination of his liability in respect of the tax (including interest, additional amounts, and additions to the tax provided by law) imposed upon the taxpayer
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Joseph Edelson and Harriet Edelson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
829 F.2d 828 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Susan J. Mayors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
785 F.2d 757 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Frank Sawyer Trust of May 1992 v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
712 F.3d 597 (First Circuit, 2013)
Estelle Want, Trustee and Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
280 F.2d 777 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Starnes v. Commissioner
680 F.3d 417 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
Joseph P. McGraw v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
384 F.3d 965 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Slone Revocable Trust v. Cir
810 F.3d 599 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Schussel v. Werfel
758 F.3d 82 (First Circuit, 2014)
Espinosa v. Commissioner
24 F. App'x 825 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Thompson v. United States
523 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (N.D. Alabama, 2007)
Andrew v. United States
91 F. Supp. 3d 739 (M.D. North Carolina, 2015)
Pert v. United States (In Re Pert)
248 B.R. 659 (M.D. Florida, 2000)
Joseph P. McGraw v. CIR
(Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 843; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 6902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/6902.