FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter B—Assessable Penalties
Penalties for aiding and abetting understatement of tax liability
26 U.S.C. § 6701
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 6701 (Penalties for aiding and abetting understatement of tax liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 6701.
Text
(a)Imposition of penalty
Any person—
(1)who aids or assists in, procures, or advises with respect to, the preparation or presentation of any portion of a return, affidavit, claim, or other document,
(2)who knows (or has reason to believe) that such portion will be used in connection with any material matter arising under the internal revenue laws, and
(3)who knows that such portion (if so used) would result in an understatement of the liability for tax of another person,
shall pay a penalty with respect to each such document in the amount determined under subsection (b).
(b)Amount of penalty
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amount of the penalty imposed by subsection (a) shall be $1,000.
If the return, affidavit, claim, or other document relates to the tax liability of a corpo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.
511 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 1994)
United States v. Thurston Paul Bell
414 F.3d 474 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Donnell R. Mattingly v. United States
924 F.2d 785 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
James M. Mullikin v. United States
952 F.2d 920 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Bill Gates v. United States
874 F.2d 584 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
In Re James E. Mitchell and Diane C. Mitchell, Debtors. James E. Mitchell Diane C. Mitchell v. United States
977 F.2d 1318 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Spriggs v. United States
660 F. Supp. 789 (E.D. Virginia, 1987)
Christian S. Nielsen v. United States
976 F.2d 951 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Kuchan v. United States
679 F. Supp. 764 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
Diversified Group Incorporated v. United States
123 Fed. Cl. 442 (Federal Claims, 2015)
Hersch v. United States
685 F. Supp. 325 (E.D. New York, 1988)
Bailey v. Internal Revenue Service
188 F.R.D. 346 (D. Arizona, 1999)
Warner v. United States
700 F. Supp. 532 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
United States v. Petrelli
704 F. Supp. 122 (N.D. Ohio, 1986)
Bartley v. United States Internal Revenue Service
343 F. Supp. 2d 649 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
United States v. Sonibare
504 F. Supp. 2d 566 (D. Minnesota, 2007)
Rodrigues v. United States
797 F. Supp. 122 (D. Rhode Island, 1992)
Lea v. United States
882 F. Supp. 687 (W.D. Tennessee, 1995)
United States v. Chipungu
(M.D. Florida, 2019)
Cheshire v. United States
991 F. Supp. 1391 (M.D. Alabama, 1997)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §324(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 615; amended Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7735(a), (b), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2403.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1989—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(1), struck out "in connection with any matter arising under the internal revenue laws" after "other document".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(2), inserted "(or has reason to believe)" after "who knows".
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(3), substituted "would result" for "will result".
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(b)(2), substituted "paragraphs (2) and (3)" for "paragraph (2)".
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(b)(1), added par. (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1989 Amendment
Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7735(c), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2404, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on December 31, 1989."
Effective Date
Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §324(c), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 616, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall take effect on the day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 3, 1982]."
Amendments
1989—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(1), struck out "in connection with any matter arising under the internal revenue laws" after "other document".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(2), inserted "(or has reason to believe)" after "who knows".
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(a)(3), substituted "would result" for "will result".
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(b)(2), substituted "paragraphs (2) and (3)" for "paragraph (2)".
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 101–239, §7735(b)(1), added par. (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1989 Amendment
Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7735(c), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2404, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on December 31, 1989."
Effective Date
Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §324(c), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 616, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall take effect on the day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 3, 1982]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 6701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/6701.