FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Expenses for production of income
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a deduction all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year—
(1)for the production or collection of income;
(2)for the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income; or
(3)in connection with the determination, collection, or refund of any tax.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
26 U.S.C. § 212 (Expenses for production of income) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodward v. Commissioner
397 U.S. 572 (Supreme Court, 1970)
George v. Zmuda and Walburga Zmuda v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
731 F.2d 1417 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
John W. Barnard & June W. Barnard, Earl D. Kay, Jr. & Nancy O. Kay, Joseph J. Allen & Jennene S. Allen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
731 F.2d 230 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Klamath Strategic Investment Fund Ex Rel. St. Croix Ventures v. United States
568 F.3d 537 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Green v. Commissioner
507 F.3d 857 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
John D. Carbine and Eleanor W. Carbine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
777 F.2d 662 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
William E. Neely and Irene R. Neely v. United States
775 F.2d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Daniel S. W. Kelly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
228 F.2d 512 (Seventh Circuit, 1956)
United States v. W. H. Cocke
399 F.2d 433 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Francis J. Markey and Hazel L. Markey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
490 F.2d 1249 (Sixth Circuit, 1974)
John K. Johnsen Frances Johnsen, Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
794 F.2d 1157 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Charles Reynolds and Beatrice Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
296 F.3d 607 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as Trustee Under Indenture Dated November 15, 1927, Made by Henry H. Rogers, Deceased v. The United States
312 F.2d 785 (Court of Claims, 1963)
Alex A. Aboussie, Alice Aboussie, Robert Aboussie and Linda Aboussie v. United States
779 F.2d 424 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
H. H. Helgerson and D. F. Helgerson v. United States of America, Frank C. Powell, Jr., and Doris Dae Powell v. United States
426 F.2d 1293 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
Prentiss M. Brown, Jr., and Margaret D. Brown v. United States
526 F.2d 135 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
Dr. Bruce Holman Audrey B. Holman v. United States
728 F.2d 462 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
Estate of Martha M. Byers, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
472 F.2d 590 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
Monroe J. Paxman and Shirley B. Paxman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
414 F.2d 265 (Tenth Circuit, 1969)
Estate of Richard Baier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
533 F.2d 117 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 69.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Denial of Deduction for Amounts Paid or Incurred on Judgments in Suits Brought To Recover Price Increases in Purchase of New Principal Residence
No deductions to be allowed in computing taxable income for two-thirds of any amount paid or incurred on a judgment entered against any person in a suit brought under section 208(b) of Pub. L. 94–12, see section 208(c) of Pub. L. 94–12, set out as a note under section 44 of this title.
Denial of Deduction for Amounts Paid or Incurred on Judgments in Suits Brought To Recover Price Increases in Purchase of New Principal Residence
No deductions to be allowed in computing taxable income for two-thirds of any amount paid or incurred on a judgment entered against any person in a suit brought under section 208(b) of Pub. L. 94–12, see section 208(c) of Pub. L. 94–12, set out as a note under section 44 of this title.