FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Omitted
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
25 U.S.C. § 677g (Omitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
406 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Hackford v. Babbitt
14 F.3d 1457 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States
584 F.3d 1275 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Allred v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 349 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Chapoose v. Clark
607 F. Supp. 1027 (D. Utah, 1985)
Tabbee v. United States
30 Fed. Cl. 1 (Federal Claims, 1993)
United States v. Perry Von Murdock
132 F.3d 534 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States
934 F. Supp. 1302 (D. Utah, 1996)
Maldonado v. Hodel
683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah, 1988)
Hackford v. United States Department of the Interior
(D. Utah, 2024)
UTE Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior
624 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (D. Utah, 2008)
Hackford v. State
(Tenth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. Murdock
(Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, acts Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §8, 68 Stat. 869; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 880, §2, 70 Stat. 936, which related to membership rolls of full-blood and mixed-blood members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Codification
Section, acts Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §8, 68 Stat. 869; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 880, §2, 70 Stat. 936, which related to membership rolls of full-blood and mixed-blood members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.