FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Sale of allotment of noncompetent Indian
25 U.S.C. § 405
Title25 — Indians
Chapter12 — LEASE, SALE, OR SURRENDER OF ALLOTTED OR UNALLOTTED LANDS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 405 (Sale of allotment of noncompetent Indian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 405.
Text
Any noncompetent Indian to whom a patent containing restrictions against alienation has been issued for an allotment of land in severalty, under any law or treaty, or who may have an interest in any allotment by inheritance, may sell or convey all or any part of such allotment or such inherited interest on such terms and conditions and under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe, and the proceeds derived therefrom shall be used for the benefit of the allottee or heir so disposing of his land or interest, under the supervision of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs; and any conveyance made hereunder and approved by the Secretary of the Interior shall convey full title to the land or interest so sold, the same as if fee-simple patent had been issued to the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.
336 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Comenout v. Washington
722 F.2d 574 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Vera Rogers Brooks, and United States of America, Plaintiff-In-Intervention v. Nez Perce County, Idaho
670 F.2d 835 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Bacher v. Patencio
232 F. Supp. 939 (S.D. California, 1964)
Ronald Colbert v. United States
785 F.3d 1384 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
Krause v. Neuman
943 P.2d 1328 (Montana Supreme Court, 1997)
Spector v. Pete
321 P.2d 59 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Work v. Mummert
29 F.2d 393 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)
Brooks v. Nez Perce County
394 F. Supp. 869 (D. Idaho, 1975)
Estoril Producing Corp. v. Murdock
1991 OK CIV APP 122 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)
ANGEL L. ARIZMENDI v. UNITED STATES
(E.D. California, 2025)
Gibson v. Colvin
(D. Nevada, 2019)
Susana Rodriguez v. Andrew Saul
(C.D. California, 2020)
Carpio v. Saul
(S.D. California, 2021)
Vinck v. Berryhill
(S.D. California, 2020)
Little v. Berryhill
(S.D. California, 2020)
(SS) Butterworth v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. California, 2023)
Fine v. Saul
(N.D. California, 2020)
(SS) Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
(E.D. California, 2023)
Tedrow v. Kijakazi
(S.D. California, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2285, 34 Stat. 1018.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/405.