FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 9
Actions for allotments
25 U.S.C. § 345
Title25 — Indians
Chapter9 — ALLOTMENT OF INDIAN LANDS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 345 (Actions for allotments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 345.
Text
All persons who are in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent who are entitled to an allotment of land under any law of Congress, or who claim to be so entitled to land under any allotment Act or under any grant made by Congress, or who claim to have been unlawfully denied or excluded from any allotment or any parcel of land to which they claim to be lawfully entitled by virtue of any Act of Congress, may commence and prosecute or defend any action, suit, or proceeding in relation to their right thereto in the proper district court of the United States; and said district courts are given jurisdiction to try and determine any action, suit, or proceeding arising within their respective jurisdictions involving the right of any person, in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent, to an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
406 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Jachetta v. United States
653 F.3d 898 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
K2 America Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLC
653 F.3d 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sarah Pence v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior of the United States and His Agents, and the United States of America
529 F.2d 135 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Mary Bartlett, on Behalf of Josephine Neuman v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
816 F.2d 695 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Genevieve Pierce, Carrie Pierce McCoy Anna Pierce, Ruth Carmichael Nee Urton, Marcus Pete, Jr., and Elizabeth Pete
235 F.2d 885 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
Alaska v. Babbitt
38 F.3d 1068 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Lena Harkins and Adam Harkins, for Themselves and for All Those Members of the Five Civilized Tribes Similarly Situated v. United States
375 F.2d 239 (Tenth Circuit, 1967)
Witt v. United States
681 F.2d 1144 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Jacob Wallace Antoine, on His Own Behalf and Also on Behalf of His Relatives Similarly Situated v. United States
637 F.2d 1177 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Stanley F. Cermak, Sr. And Raymond Cermak, Sr. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of Interior
234 F.3d 1356 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County Commissioners
883 P.2d 136 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1994)
Iris Bird Bear and Rosalie Bird Bear (A/k/a Rose Chavarria) v. McLean County
513 F.2d 190 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
E. Nedene Wardle v. Northwest Investment Company
830 F.2d 118 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Albert Pinkham, Sr. Cyrus Wilkinson Connie Allen Moore Francis Allen v. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District, and United States of America
862 F.2d 184 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Irene Mitchell Pallin v. United States of America and Edward Elmer Mitchell, Jr.
496 F.2d 27 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Conroy v. Conroy
369 F. Supp. 179 (D. South Dakota, 1973)
United States v. Lowry
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Wright v. United States
(E.D. Oklahoma, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1894, ch. 290, §1, 28 Stat. 305; Feb. 6, 1901, ch. 217, §1, 31 Stat. 760; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Act Mar. 3, 1911, conferred the powers and duties of the former circuit courts upon the district courts.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Repeal of Section as to Osage Indians
Act June 28, 1906, ch. 3572, §1, 34 Stat. 540, provided in part that: "the provisions of the Act of Congress of August fifteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, Twenty-eighth Statutes at Large, page three hundred and five [this section], granting persons of Indian blood who have been denied allotments the right to appeal to the courts, are hereby repealed as far as the same relate to the Osage Indians; and the tribal lands and tribal funds of said tribe shall be equally divided among the members of said tribe as hereinafter provided."
Codification
Act Mar. 3, 1911, conferred the powers and duties of the former circuit courts upon the district courts.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Repeal of Section as to Osage Indians
Act June 28, 1906, ch. 3572, §1, 34 Stat. 540, provided in part that: "the provisions of the Act of Congress of August fifteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, Twenty-eighth Statutes at Large, page three hundred and five [this section], granting persons of Indian blood who have been denied allotments the right to appeal to the courts, are hereby repealed as far as the same relate to the Osage Indians; and the tribal lands and tribal funds of said tribe shall be equally divided among the members of said tribe as hereinafter provided."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/345.