FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Definitions

25 U.S.C. § 2703
Title25Indians
Chapter29 — INDIAN GAMING REGULATION

This text of 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (Definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 2703.

Text

For purposes of this chapter—

(1)The term "Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the United States.
(2)The term "Chairman" means the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission.
(3)The term "Commission" means the National Indian Gaming Commission established pursuant to section 2704 of this title.
(4)The term "Indian lands" means—
(A)all lands within the limits of any Indian reservation; and
(B)any lands title to which is either held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction by the United States against alienation and over which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power.
(5)The term "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. Patrick
693 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2012)
210 case citations
Amador County, Cal. v. Salazar
640 F.3d 373 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
56 case citations
North County Community Alliance, Inc. v. Salazar
573 F.3d 738 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
41 case citations
Cayuga Nation v. Howard Tanner
6 F.4th 361 (Second Circuit, 2021)
41 case citations
Cossey v. Cherokee Nation Enterprises, LLC
2009 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
35 case citations
Tomac v. Norton
193 F. Supp. 2d 182 (District of Columbia, 2002)
34 case citations
City of Roseville v. Norton
219 F. Supp. 2d 130 (District of Columbia, 2002)
29 case citations
Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. Chaudhuri
802 F.3d 267 (Second Circuit, 2015)
19 case citations
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Michigan
800 F. Supp. 1484 (W.D. Michigan, 1992)
17 case citations
Patchak v. Salazar
632 F.3d 702 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
17 case citations
Nebraska Ex Rel. Bruning v. United States Department of Interior
625 F.3d 501 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
9 case citations
Stand up for California v. State of Cal.
6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
9 case citations
Calvello v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
1998 SD 107 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
9 case citations
State v. Gohl
477 N.W.2d 205 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1991)
6 case citations
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United States
914 F. Supp. 1496 (W.D. Michigan, 1996)
5 case citations
State of Kansas v. United States
249 F.3d 1213 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
5 case citations
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. State of Cal.
788 F. Supp. 1513 (E.D. California, 1992)
5 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 100–497, §4, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467; Pub. L. 102–238, §2(a), Dec. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 1908; Pub. L. 102–497, §16, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3261.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
1992—Par. (7)(E). Pub. L. 102–497 struck out "or Montana" after "Wisconsin".
1991—Par. (7)(E), (F). Pub. L. 102–238 added subpars. (E) and (F).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Class II Gaming With Respect to Indian Tribes in Wisconsin or Montana Engaged in Negotiating Tribal-State Compacts
Pub. L. 101–301, §6, May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 209, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the term 'class II gaming' includes, for purposes of applying Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.] with respect to any Indian tribe located in the State of Wisconsin or the State of Montana, during the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act [May 24, 1990], any gaming described in section 4(7)(B)(ii) of Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2703(7)(B)(ii)] that was legally operated on Indian lands on or before May 1, 1988, if the Indian tribe having jurisdiction over the lands on which such gaming was operated made a request, by no later than November 16, 1988, to the State in which such gaming is operated to negotiate a Tribal-State compact under section 11(d)(3) of Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(3)]."

Tribal-State Compact Covering Indian Tribes in Minnesota; Operation of Class II Games; Allowance of Additional Year for Negotiations
Pub. L. 101–121, title I, §118, Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 722, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the term 'Class II gaming' in Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.], for any Indian tribe located in the State of Minnesota, includes, during the period commencing on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 23, 1989] and continuing for 365 days from that date, any gaming described in section 4(7)(B)(ii) of Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2703(7)(B)(ii)] that was legally operated on Indian lands on or before May 1, 1988, if the Indian tribe having jurisdication [sic] over the lands on which such gaming was operated, requested the State of Minnesota, no later than 30 days after the date of enactment of Public Law 100–497 [Oct. 17, 1988], to negotiate a tribal-state compact pursuant to section 11(d)(3) of Public Law 100–497 [25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(3)]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 2703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/2703.