FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
Reassumption of jurisdiction over child custody proceedings
25 U.S.C. § 1918
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1918 (Reassumption of jurisdiction over child custody proceedings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1918.
Text
(a)Petition; suitable plan; approval by Secretary
Any Indian tribe which became subject to State jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of the Act of August 15, 1953 (67 Stat. 588), as amended by title IV of the Act of April 11, 1968 (82 Stat. 73, 78), or pursuant to any other Federal law, may reassume jurisdiction over child custody proceedings. Before any Indian tribe may reassume jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, such tribe shall present to the Secretary for approval a petition to reassume such jurisdiction which includes a suitable plan to exercise such jurisdiction.
(b)Criteria applicable to consideration by Secretary; partial retrocession
(1)In considering the petition and feasibility of the plan of a tribe under subsection (a), the Secretary may consider, among
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
490 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. Mejia
906 S.W.2d 152 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
John v. Baker
982 P.2d 738 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1999)
Doe v. Mann
285 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (N.D. California, 2003)
Cherokee Nation v. Nomura
2007 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2007)
State v. Native Village of Tanana
249 P.3d 734 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2011)
Native Village of Nenana v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
722 P.2d 219 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1986)
In re F.P.
843 P.2d 1214 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1992)
In re K.E.
744 P.2d 1173 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1987)
Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council v. Alaska
687 F. Supp. 1380 (D. Alaska, 1988)
In re C.R.H.
29 P.3d 849 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2001)
Native Village of Venetie v. State of Alaska
944 F.2d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Termination of Parental Rights of John Doe (2014-25)
349 P.3d 1205 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2015)
Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council v. Alaska
918 F.2d 797 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Doe v. Mann
415 F.3d 1038 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Siskiyou County Human Services/Adult & Children's Services Department v. Karuk Tribe
137 Cal. App. 4th 567 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
In Re MA
40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 439 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber
238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
P. ex rel. etc. v. Huber 9/2518 CA1/4 Case Details
(California Court of Appeal, 2018)
Matter of FP
843 P.2d 1214 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1992)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §108, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3074.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Act of August 15, 1953, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, 67 Stat. 588, which enacted section 1162 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, section 1360 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and provisions set out as notes under section 1360 of Title 28. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
References in Text
Act of August 15, 1953, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, 67 Stat. 588, which enacted section 1162 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, section 1360 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and provisions set out as notes under section 1360 of Title 28. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1918.