FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
Agreements between States and Indian tribes
25 U.S.C. § 1919
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1919 (Agreements between States and Indian tribes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1919.
Text
(a)Subject coverage
States and Indian tribes are authorized to enter into agreements with each other respecting care and custody of Indian children and jurisdiction over child custody proceedings, including agreements which may provide for orderly transfer of jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis and agreements which provide for concurrent jurisdiction between States and Indian tribes.
(b)Revocation; notice; actions or proceedings unaffected
Such agreements may be revoked by either party upon one hundred and eighty days' written notice to the other party. Such revocation shall not affect any action or proceeding over which a court has already assumed jurisdiction, unless the agreement provides otherwise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Red Fox v. Hettich
494 N.W.2d 638 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)
Native Village of Stevens v. Smith
770 F.2d 1486 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
State v. Native Village of Tanana
249 P.3d 734 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2011)
In re the Welfare of R.S.
805 N.W.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2011)
In Re MM
65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)
In Re the Matter of J.D.M.C.
2007 SD 97 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
State ex rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. Klamath Tribe
11 P.3d 701 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
In re E.G.M.
750 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
IN THE MATTER OF S.J.W.
2023 OK 49 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2023)
In re J.M.
718 P.2d 150 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1986)
Department of Social & Health Services v. B.D.W.
108 Wash. App. 664 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
Sayers Ex Rel. Sayers v. Beltrami County
481 N.W.2d 547 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1992)
HAMMER v. STATE
2022 OK 80 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2022)
Sayers Ex Rel. Sayers v. Beltrami County
472 N.W.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1991)
Termination of Parental Rights of John Doe (2014-25)
349 P.3d 1205 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2015)
Adoption of Arnold
741 N.E.2d 456 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2001)
Raena R. v. State
272 P.3d 126 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2012)
In Re Smmd
272 P.3d 126 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2012)
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.D.B.
2025 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2025)
In Re JDMC
2007 SD 97 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §109, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3074.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1919.