FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 19
Omitted
25 U.S.C. § 1775
Title25 — Indians
Chapter19 — INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENTS
SubchapterIX
Current throughPub. L. 119-99
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1775 (Omitted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1775.
Text
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.
794 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
Connecticut ex rel. Blumenthal v. United States Department of the Interior
228 F.3d 82 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Narragansett Indian v. State of Rhode Islan
449 F.3d 16 (First Circuit, 2006)
State v. Sebastian
701 A.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)
Dark-Eyes v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
887 A.2d 848 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Mohegan Tribe of Indians v. Mohegan Tribe & Nation, Inc.
769 A.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
6 Am. Tribal Law 592 (Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court, 2006)
Native American Mohegans v. United States
184 F. Supp. 2d 198 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Buzulis v. Mohegan Sun Casino
871 N.E.2d 527 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2007)
Strom v. Curtiss, No. Cv 00 0092123 S (Nov. 8, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14189 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Mohegan Tribe, Indians v. Mohegan Tribe Nation, No. 110562 (Oct. 16, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 11662 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Fournier Irrigation v. Jay's Landscap., No. Cv 02 0813649 S (Jul. 19, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9360 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Buzulis v. Mohegan Sun Casino
2006 Mass. App. Div. 145 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 2006)
State of Connecticut v. the United States Department of the Interior
228 F.3d 82 (Second Circuit, 2000)
State v. Brodeur, No. Mv 00-127334 (Nov. 28, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15941-x (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Paszkowski v. Chapman, No. Cv01 0072786s (Aug. 30, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 12006 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 103–377, §2, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3501, which set out congressional findings and purposes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 103–377, §1, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3501, provided that Pub. L. 103–377, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Mohegan Nation of Connecticut Land Claims Settlement Act of 1994".
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 103–377, §2, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3501, which set out congressional findings and purposes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 103–377, §1, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3501, provided that Pub. L. 103–377, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Mohegan Nation of Connecticut Land Claims Settlement Act of 1994".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1775.