FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
Definitions
25 U.S.C. § 1301
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1301 (Definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1301.
Text
For purposes of this subchapter, the term—
(1)"Indian tribe" means any tribe, band, or other group of Indians subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and recognized as possessing powers of self-government;
(2)"powers of self-government" means and includes all governmental powers possessed by an Indian tribe, executive, legislative, and judicial, and all offices, bodies, and tribunals by and through which they are executed, including courts of Indian offenses; and means the inherent power of Indian tribes, hereby recognized and affirmed, to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians;
(3)"Indian court" means any Indian tribal court or court of Indian offense; and
(4)"Indian" means any person who would be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as an Indian under se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
436 U.S. 49 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
134 S. Ct. 2024 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Nevada v. Hicks
533 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Russell Means v. Dick Wilson
522 F.2d 833 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Ricco Devon Prentiss
256 F.3d 971 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
Dry v. United States
235 F.3d 1249 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)
280 F.3d 1008 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Michael L. Enas
255 F.3d 662 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Ryan
404 F.3d 48 (First Circuit, 2005)
Means v. Navajo Nation
432 F.3d 924 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Seneca Constitutional Rights Organization v. George
348 F. Supp. 48 (W.D. New York, 1972)
Means v. Northern Cheyenne Tribal Court
154 F.3d 941 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Window Rock Unified School District v. Reeves
861 F.3d 894 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
National Farmers Union Insurance Companies, a Utah Corporation, and Lodge Grass School District No. 27 v. Crow Tribe of Indians
736 F.2d 1320 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Dye v. Choctaw Casino of Pocola
2009 OK 52 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
Harrison v. State
791 P.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1990)
State v. Hill
373 P.3d 162 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
United States v. Michael L. Enas, Opinion
204 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Billy Jo Lara, Also Known as Billy Joe Lara
294 F.3d 1004 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. Erica Madore
128 F.4th 929 (Eighth Circuit, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 90–284, title II, §201, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, §8077(b), (c), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1892.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1990—Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–511, §8077(b), inserted at end "means the inherent power of Indian tribes, hereby recognized and affirmed, to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians;".
Par. (4). Pub. L. 101–511, §8077(c), added par. (4).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Title II of Pub. L. 90–284, which is classified generally to this subchapter, is popularly known as the "Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968".
Time Limitation on Criminal Misdemeanor Jurisdiction of Tribal Courts Over Non-Member Indians
Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, §8077(d), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1893, as amended by Pub. L. 102–124, §1, Oct. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 616, which provided that the effects of subsecs. (b) and (c), which amended this section, as those subsections affect the criminal misdemeanor jurisdiction of tribal courts over non-member Indians have no effect after Oct. 18, 1991, was repealed by Pub. L. 102–137, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 646. Subsequent to repeal, Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, §8112A(b), Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1202, purported to amend section 8077(d) of Pub. L. 101–511 by substituting "1993" for "1991".
Amendments
1990—Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–511, §8077(b), inserted at end "means the inherent power of Indian tribes, hereby recognized and affirmed, to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians;".
Par. (4). Pub. L. 101–511, §8077(c), added par. (4).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Title II of Pub. L. 90–284, which is classified generally to this subchapter, is popularly known as the "Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968".
Time Limitation on Criminal Misdemeanor Jurisdiction of Tribal Courts Over Non-Member Indians
Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, §8077(d), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1893, as amended by Pub. L. 102–124, §1, Oct. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 616, which provided that the effects of subsecs. (b) and (c), which amended this section, as those subsections affect the criminal misdemeanor jurisdiction of tribal courts over non-member Indians have no effect after Oct. 18, 1991, was repealed by Pub. L. 102–137, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 646. Subsequent to repeal, Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, §8112A(b), Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1202, purported to amend section 8077(d) of Pub. L. 101–511 by substituting "1993" for "1991".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1301.