FEDERAL · 22 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER XI—GRIEVANCES

Foreign Service Grievance Board procedures

22 U.S.C. § 4136
Title22Foreign Relations and Intercourse
ChapterSUBCHAPTER XI—GRIEVANCES

This text of 22 U.S.C. § 4136 (Foreign Service Grievance Board procedures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
22 U.S.C. § 4136.

Text

The Board may adopt regulations concerning its organization and procedures. Such regulations shall include provision for the following:

(1)The Board shall conduct a hearing at the request of a grievant in any case which involves—
(A)disciplinary action or the retirement of a grievant from the Service under section 4007 or 4008 of this title, or
(B)issues which, in the judgment of the Board, can best be resolved by a hearing or presentation of oral argument.
(2)The grievant, the representatives of the grievant, the exclusive representative (if the grievant is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the exclusive representative), and the representatives of the Department are entitled to be present at the hearing. The Board may, after considering the views of the parties and any ot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Foreign Service Grievance Board
503 F. Supp. 2d 163 (District of Columbia, 2007)
185 case citations
Herbert T. Mitchell v. Warren Christopher, Secretary of State
996 F.2d 375 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
38 case citations
Thompson v. Department of State
400 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2005)
20 case citations
J.M. Miller v. James A. Baker, Iii, in His Capacity as Secretary of State
969 F.2d 1098 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
6 case citations
Beberman v. United States
129 Fed. Cl. 539 (Federal Claims, 2016)
5 case citations
Bettucci v. United States
14 F. Supp. 2d 45 (District of Columbia, 1998)
4 case citations
Thompson v. Pope
397 F. Supp. 2d 28 (District of Columbia, 2005)
3 case citations
Julie Beberman v. Antony Blinken
61 F.4th 978 (D.C. Circuit, 2023)
3 case citations
John J. Harter v. United States of America
871 F.2d 1140 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
2 case citations
Miller v. Baker
749 F. Supp. 293 (District of Columbia, 1990)
1 case citations
Beberman v. Blinken
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Beberman v. Pompeo
(District of Columbia, 2021)
Beberman v. Rubio
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Beberman v. U.S. Department of State
(District of Columbia, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §1106, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2145; Pub. L. 101–167, title V, §586(a), Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1252; Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §143(b), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §§177(a), 181(a)(4)(B), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 414, 417; Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title III, §314(b), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1379; Pub. L. 109–140, §5, Dec. 22, 2005, 119 Stat. 2652.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2005—Par. (8). Pub. L. 109–140 inserted "the involuntary separation of the grievant (other than an involuntary separation for cause under section 4010(a) of this title)," after "considering" and substituted "the grievant, or" for "the grievant or".
2002—Par. (8). Pub. L. 107–228, in first sentence, struck out "the involuntary separation of the grievant," before "disciplinary action" and substituted "grievant or" for "grievant, or", and struck out last sentence which read as follows: "Notwithstanding the first sentence of this paragraph, the Board's authority to suspend such action shall not extend to instances where the Secretary, or his designee, has exercised his authority under subsection (a)(3) of section 4010 of this title or with respect to any action which would delay the separation of an employee pursuant to a reduction in force conducted under section 4010a of this title."
1994—Par. (8). Pub. L. 103–236, §181(a)(4)(B), inserted before period at end "or with respect to any action which would delay the separation of an employee pursuant to a reduction in force conducted under section 4010a of this title".
Pub. L. 103–236, §177(a), substituted "until the date which is one year after such determination or until the Board has ruled upon the grievance, whichever comes first. The Board shall extend the one-year limitation under the preceding sentence and the Department shall continue to suspend such action, if the Board determines that the agency or the Board is responsible for the delay in the resolution of the grievance. The Board may also extend the 1-year limit if it determines that the delay is due to the complexity of the case, the unavailability of witnesses or to circumstances beyond the control of the agency, the Board or the grievant." for "until the Board has ruled upon the grievance."
1991—Par. (8). Pub. L. 102–138 substituted "exercised his authority under subsection (a)(3) of section 4010 of this title" for "determined that there is reasonable cause to believe that a grievant has committed a job-related crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed and has taken action to suspend the grievant without pay pending a final resolution of the underlying matter".
1989—Par. (8). Pub. L. 101–167 inserted at end "Notwithstanding the first sentence of this paragraph, the Board's authority to suspend such action shall not extend to instances where the Secretary, or his designee, has determined that there is reasonable cause to believe that a grievant has committed a job-related crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed and has taken action to suspend the grievant without pay pending a final resolution of the underlying matter."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 U.S.C. § 4136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/22/4136.