FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
Attorney General
21 U.S.C. § 871
This text of 21 U.S.C. § 871 (Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 871.
Text
(a)Delegation of functions
The Attorney General may delegate any of his functions under this subchapter to any officer or employee of the Department of Justice.
(b)Rules and regulations
The Attorney General may promulgate and enforce any rules, regulations, and procedures which he may deem necessary and appropriate for the efficient execution of his functions under this subchapter.
(c)Acceptance of devises, bequests, gifts, and donations
The Attorney General may accept in the name of the Department of Justice any form of devise, bequest, gift, or donation where the donor intends to donate property for the purpose of preventing or controlling the abuse of controlled substances. He may take all appropriate steps to secure possession of such property and may sell, assign, transfer, or conv
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzales v. Oregon
546 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, in Rem-Appellant
689 F.2d 10 (Second Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Maurice W. Rosenberg, M.D.
515 F.2d 190 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Gavrilovic
551 F.2d 1099 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Garry Jordan
810 F.2d 262 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Carl Eric Olsen v. Drug Enforcement Administration, Carl Eric Olsen v. John Lawn, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration
878 F.2d 1458 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Lawson
502 F. Supp. 158 (D. Maryland, 1980)
United States v. Daniel Touby, United States of America v. Lyrissa Touby
909 F.2d 759 (Third Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Arthur R. Black
512 F.2d 864 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Sherrod
964 F.2d 1501 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Jack Edgar Burnes
816 F.2d 1354 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Oregon v. Ashcroft
368 F.3d 1118 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association
689 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
American Medical Association v. Janet Reno, Attorney General
57 F.3d 1129 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (Norml) v. Drug Enforcement Administration, U. S. Department of Justice
559 F.2d 735 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
United States v. James P. Wisniewski
741 F.2d 138 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
United States v. William Waldo Emerson, United States of America v. Scott Wollman, United States of America v. Bruce Ehrlich
846 F.2d 541 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Hemp Industries Association v. DEA
36 F.4th 278 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
United States v. One 1972 Chevrolet Nova, Vehicle I. D. No. 1x27d2w125901
560 F.2d 464 (First Circuit, 1977)
Oregon v. Ashcroft
192 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (D. Oregon, 2002)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §501, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1270.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242, and is popularly known as the "Controlled Substances Act". For complete classification of title II to the Code, see second paragraph of Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242, and is popularly known as the "Controlled Substances Act". For complete classification of title II to the Code, see second paragraph of Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/871.