FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT

Removal of exemption of certain drugs

21 U.S.C. § 814
Title21Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
PartB

This text of 21 U.S.C. § 814 (Removal of exemption of certain drugs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 814.

Text

(a)Removal of exemption The Attorney General shall by regulation remove from exemption under section 802(39)(A)(iv) of this title a drug or group of drugs that the Attorney General finds is being diverted to obtain a listed chemical for use in the illicit production of a controlled substance.
(b)Factors to be considered In removing a drug or group of drugs from exemption under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall consider, with respect to a drug or group of drugs that is proposed to be removed from exemption—
(1)the scope, duration, and significance of the diversion;
(2)whether the drug or group of drugs is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance; and
(3)whether the listed chemical can be readily recovered from t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
362 F.3d 786 (D.C. Circuit, 2004)
673 case citations
Collado v. United States
581 F. Supp. 2d 282 (D. Puerto Rico, 2008)
3 case citations
United States v. Ahmed
140 F. App'x 1 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
1 case citations
United States v. Williams
428 F. App'x 242 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
1 case citations
United States v. Johnson
992 F. Supp. 1257 (D. Kansas, 1998)
1 case citations
United States v. Aranda-Diaz
31 F. Supp. 3d 1304 (D. New Mexico, 2014)
Kevin Obi v. United States
(Sixth Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Heraldo Mojica, Jr.
(Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Meachem v. United States
(S.D. New York, 2020)
United States v. Edgar Arnold Garcia
(Eleventh Circuit, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 103–200, §2(b)(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2334; amended Pub. L. 104–237, title IV, §401(c), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3108; Pub. L. 109–177, title VII, §712(a)(2), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 263.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2006—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 109–177 struck out subsec. (e). Text read as follows: "Pursuant to subsection (d)(1) of this section, the Attorney General shall by regulation reinstate the exemption with respect to a particular ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine drug product if the Attorney General determines that the drug product is manufactured and distributed in a manner that prevents diversion. In making this determination the Attorney General shall consider the factors listed in subsection (d)(2) of this section. Any regulation issued pursuant to this subsection may be amended or revoked based on the factors listed in subsection (d)(4) of this section."
1996—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104–237 added subsec. (e).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–237 not applicable to sale of any pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine product prior to 12 months after Oct. 3, 1996, except that, on application of manufacturer of particular drug product, Attorney General may exercise sole and judicially unreviewable discretion to extend such effective date up to additional 6 months, see section 401(g) of Pub. L. 104–237, set out as a note under section 802 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective on date that is 120 days after Dec. 17, 1993, see section 11 of Pub. L. 103–200, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 802 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/814.