United States v. Williams
This text of United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6795
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NAMOND EARL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Namond Brewington, a/k/a Tony Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00135-JFM-4)
Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 3, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Namond Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Namond Earl Williams appeals the district court’s
orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-williams-ca4-2011.