FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—AUXILIARY PROVISIONS
Non-Federal jurisdiction of federally regulated matters; prohibition of additional or different requirements for establishments with inspection services and as to marking, labeling, packaging, and ingredients; recordkeeping and related requirements; concurrent jurisdiction over distribution for human food purposes of adulterated or misbranded and imported articles; other matters
21 U.S.C. § 678
Title21 — Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—AUXILIARY PROVISIONS
This text of 21 U.S.C. § 678 (Non-Federal jurisdiction of federally regulated matters; prohibition of additional or different requirements for establishments with inspection services and as to marking, labeling, packaging, and ingredients; recordkeeping and related requirements; concurrent jurisdiction over distribution for human food purposes of adulterated or misbranded and imported articles; other matters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 678.
Text
Requirements within the scope of this chapter with respect to premises, facilities and operations of any establishment at which inspection is provided under subchapter I of this chapter, which are in addition to, or different than those made under this chapter may not be imposed by any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, except that any such jurisdiction may impose recordkeeping and other requirements within the scope of section 642 of this title, if consistent therewith, with respect to any such establishment. Marking, labeling, packaging, or ingredient requirements in addition to, or different than, those made under this chapter may not be imposed by any State or Territory or the District of Columbia with respect to articles prepared at any establishment under inspection in a
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. Rath Packing Co.
430 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Alex Berezovsky v. Bank of America
869 F.3d 923 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Rath Packing Co. v. Becker
530 F.2d 1295 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Worm v. American Cyanamid Co.
970 F.2d 1301 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Rudolph George Stanko
491 F.3d 408 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
National Meat Assn. v. Harris
132 S. Ct. 965 (Supreme Court, 2012)
American Meat Institute v. Leeman
180 Cal. App. 4th 728 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
Chicago-Midwest Meat Association v. City of Evanston
589 F.2d 278 (Seventh Circuit, 1979)
Empacadora De Carnes De Fresnillo, S.A. De C v. v. Curry
476 F.3d 326 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Armour & Co. v. Ball
468 F.2d 76 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
National Ass'n of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. v. City of Providence
731 F.3d 71 (First Circuit, 2013)
Doctors Hospital, Inc. v. Luis Silva Recio, Secretary of Labor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
558 F.2d 619 (First Circuit, 1977)
Animal Legal Defense Fund Boston, Inc. v. Provimi Veal Corp.
626 F. Supp. 278 (D. Massachusetts, 1986)
People v. Rath Packing Co.
85 Cal. App. 3d 308 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
National Broiler Council v. Voss
44 F.3d 740 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Rath Packing Company v. Becker
357 F. Supp. 529 (C.D. California, 1973)
Tyrrell v. BNSF Railway Co.
2016 MT 126 (Montana Supreme Court, 2016)
Weston v. Kim's Dollar Store
731 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
Estate of Kriefall Ex Rel. Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.
2003 WI App 119 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2003)
Commonwealth v. Haseotes
249 N.E.2d 639 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1969)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §16, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 600.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/678.