FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY
Proposed deferrals of budget authority
2 U.S.C. § 684
Title2 — The Congress
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY
This text of 2 U.S.C. § 684 (Proposed deferrals of budget authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 684.
Text
(a)Transmittal of special message
Whenever the President, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the head of any department or agency of the United States, or any officer or employee of the United States proposes to defer any budget authority provided for a specific purpose or project, the President shall transmit to the House of Representatives and the Senate a special message specifying—
(1)the amount of the budget authority proposed to be deferred;
(2)any account, department, or establishment of the Government to which such budget authority is available for obligation, and the specific projects or governmental functions involved;
(3)the period of time during which the budget authority is proposed to be deferred;
(4)the reasons for the proposed deferral, including any
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Elinor R. Bacon v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
757 F.2d 265 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
City of New Haven v. United States
809 F.2d 900 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Byrd v. Raines
956 F. Supp. 25 (District of Columbia, 1997)
City of New Haven, Connecticut v. United States
634 F. Supp. 1449 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump (AMENDED OPINION)
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Mid-Ohio Food Bank v. Lyng
670 F. Supp. 403 (District of Columbia, 1987)
Child Trends, Incorporated v. United States Department of Education
(D. Maryland, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1013, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 100–119, title II, §206(a), Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 785.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 1403 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Amendments
1987—Pub. L. 100–119 amended section generally, substituting substantially similar provisions in subsecs. (a) and (c) and substituting subsec. (b) for former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "Any amount of budget authority proposed to be deferred, as set forth in a special message transmitted under subsection (a) of this section, shall be made available for obligation if either House of Congress passes an impoundment resolution disapproving such proposed deferral."
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 1403 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Amendments
1987—Pub. L. 100–119 amended section generally, substituting substantially similar provisions in subsecs. (a) and (c) and substituting subsec. (b) for former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "Any amount of budget authority proposed to be deferred, as set forth in a special message transmitted under subsection (a) of this section, shall be made available for obligation if either House of Congress passes an impoundment resolution disapproving such proposed deferral."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/684.