FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY
Rescission of budget authority
2 U.S.C. § 683
Title2 — The Congress
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY
This text of 2 U.S.C. § 683 (Rescission of budget authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 683.
Text
(a)Transmittal of special message
Whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including the termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), or whenever all or part of budget authority provided for only one fiscal year is to be reserved from obligation for such fiscal year, the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message specifying—
(1)the amount of budget authority which he proposes to be rescinded or which is to be so reserved;
(2)any account, department, or establishment of the Government to which s
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re: Aiken County
725 F.3d 255 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Policy & Research, LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
313 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Elinor R. Bacon v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
757 F.2d 265 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
City of New Haven v. United States
809 F.2d 900 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Byrd v. Raines
956 F. Supp. 25 (District of Columbia, 1997)
County of Santa Clara v. Trump
275 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (N.D. California, 2017)
City of New Haven, Connecticut v. United States
634 F. Supp. 1449 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump (AMENDED OPINION)
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Child Trends, Incorporated v. United States Department of Education
(D. Maryland, 2025)
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trump
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Appalachian Voices v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Protect Democracy Project v. U.S. Office of Management and Budget
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Harris County, Texas v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Policy and Research, LLC v. Department of Health and Human Services
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1012, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 333; Pub. L. 100–119, title II, §207, Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 786.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 1402 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–119 inserted at end "Funds made available for obligation under this procedure may not be proposed for rescission again."
Codification
Section was formerly classified to section 1402 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–119 inserted at end "Funds made available for obligation under this procedure may not be proposed for rescission again."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/683.