FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

Civil action

2 U.S.C. § 1408
Title2The Congress
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

This text of 2 U.S.C. § 1408 (Civil action) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 1408.

Text

(a)Jurisdiction The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action commenced under section 1401 of this title and this section by a covered employee.
(b)Parties The defendant shall be the employing office alleged to have committed the violation, or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred.
(c)Jury trial Any party may demand a jury trial where a jury trial would be available in an action against a private defendant under the relevant law made applicable by this chapter. In any case in which a violation of section 1311 of this title is alleged, the court shall not inform the jury of the maximum amount of compensatory damages available under section 1311(b)(1) or 1311(b)(3) of this title.
(d)Appearances by House Employment Counsel The House Em

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police Board
826 F. Supp. 2d 59 (District of Columbia, 2011)
122 case citations
Hyson v. Architect of the Capitol
802 F. Supp. 2d 84 (District of Columbia, 2011)
41 case citations
Thompson v. Capitol Police Board
120 F. Supp. 2d 78 (District of Columbia, 2000)
34 case citations
Brady v. Livingood
456 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2006)
33 case citations
Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
563 F. Supp. 2d 228 (District of Columbia, 2008)
32 case citations
Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
750 F. Supp. 2d 82 (District of Columbia, 2010)
29 case citations
Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms of the United States Senate
209 F. Supp. 2d 175 (District of Columbia, 2002)
25 case citations
Epps v. United States Capitol Police Board
719 F. Supp. 2d 7 (District of Columbia, 2010)
20 case citations
Joyce v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
966 F. Supp. 2d 15 (District of Columbia, 2013)
18 case citations
Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
847 F. Supp. 2d 57 (District of Columbia, 2012)
13 case citations
Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board
338 F. Supp. 2d 97 (District of Columbia, 2004)
11 case citations
Reynolds v. U.S. Capitol Police Board
357 F. Supp. 2d 2 (District of Columbia, 2004)
8 case citations
Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
964 F. Supp. 2d 71 (District of Columbia, 2013)
7 case citations
Clendenny v. Architect of the Capitol
236 F. Supp. 3d 11 (District of Columbia, 2017)
7 case citations
Bradshaw v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
856 F. Supp. 2d 126 (District of Columbia, 2012)
4 case citations
Bing v. Architect Capitol
300 F. Supp. 3d 53 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
4 case citations
MacOn v. United States Capitol Police Board
258 F. Supp. 3d 94 (District of Columbia, 2017)
2 case citations
Ham v. Ayers
318 F. Supp. 3d 296 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
1 case citations
Ham v. Ayers
(District of Columbia, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, §408, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 37; Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §119(a), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 573; Pub. L. 115–397, title I, §101(b), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5300.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (c) and (d)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–397 substituted "section 1401 of this title" for "section 1404 of this title" and struck out "who has completed counseling under section 1402 of this title and mediation under section 1403 of this title. A civil action may be commenced by a covered employee only to seek redress for a violation for which the employee has completed counseling and mediation" after "covered employee".
2001—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–68 added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–397 effective upon expiration of the 180-day period beginning on Dec. 21, 2018, with provisions for effect on pending proceedings, see section 401 of Pub. L. 115–397, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

Effective Date of 2001 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §119(b), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 574, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to proceedings occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 12, 2001]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 1408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/1408.