FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
Initiation of procedures
2 U.S.C. § 1402
Title2 — The Congress
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
This text of 2 U.S.C. § 1402 (Initiation of procedures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 1402.
Text
(a)Claim
To commence a proceeding under this subchapter, a covered employee alleging a violation of law made applicable under part A of subchapter II shall file a claim with the Office. The Office shall not accept a claim which is filed after the deadline applicable under subsection (d).
The claim filed under this section shall be made in writing under oath or affirmation, shall describe the facts that form the basis of the claim and the violation that is being alleged, shall identify the employing office alleged to have committed the violation or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, and shall be in such form as the Office requires.
Nothing in paragraph (2), or subsection (b) or (c), may be construed to limit the ability of a covered employee—
(A)to contact the Office or a
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board
575 F.3d 699 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee
968 F. Supp. 2d 308 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Moran v. United States Capitol Police Board
820 F. Supp. 2d 48 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Thompson v. Capitol Police Board
120 F. Supp. 2d 78 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Brady v. Livingood
456 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
563 F. Supp. 2d 228 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
750 F. Supp. 2d 82 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Ross v. United States Capitol Police
195 F. Supp. 3d 180 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms of the United States Senate
209 F. Supp. 2d 175 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Young v. Office of United States Senate Sergeant at Arms
217 F.R.D. 61 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Adams v. United States Capitol Police Board
564 F. Supp. 2d 37 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Joyce v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
966 F. Supp. 2d 15 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
964 F. Supp. 2d 81 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Turner v. United States Capitol Police Board
983 F. Supp. 2d 98 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
847 F. Supp. 2d 57 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board
338 F. Supp. 2d 97 (District of Columbia, 2004)
Reynolds v. U.S. Capitol Police Board
357 F. Supp. 2d 2 (District of Columbia, 2004)
Turner v. United States Capitol Police
653 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
Sherry M. Britton v. Office of Compliance, and Office of Architect of the Capitol
412 F.3d 1324 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Brady v. United States Capitol Police
200 F. Supp. 3d 208 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, §402, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 115–397, title I, §102(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5301.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Part A of subchapter II, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), (3)(B), was in the original "part A of title II", meaning part A (§§201–207) of title II of Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 7, which is classified principally to part A of subchapter II of this chapter. For complete classification of part A to the Code, see Tables.
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(3)(A) and (b)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Pub. L. 115–397 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to counseling prior to commencing a proceeding.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–397 effective upon expiration of the 180-day period beginning on Dec. 21, 2018, with provisions for effect on pending proceedings, see section 401 of Pub. L. 115–397, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
References in Text
Part A of subchapter II, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), (3)(B), was in the original "part A of title II", meaning part A (§§201–207) of title II of Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 7, which is classified principally to part A of subchapter II of this chapter. For complete classification of part A to the Code, see Tables.
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(3)(A) and (b)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2018—Pub. L. 115–397 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to counseling prior to commencing a proceeding.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–397 effective upon expiration of the 180-day period beginning on Dec. 21, 2018, with provisions for effect on pending proceedings, see section 401 of Pub. L. 115–397, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/1402.