FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—EXTENSION OF RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS
Prohibition of intimidation or reprisal
2 U.S.C. § 1317
This text of 2 U.S.C. § 1317 (Prohibition of intimidation or reprisal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 1317.
Text
(a)In general
It shall be unlawful for an employing office to intimidate, take reprisal against, or otherwise discriminate against, any covered employee because the covered employee has opposed any practice made unlawful by this chapter, or because the covered employee has initiated proceedings, made a charge, or testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in a hearing or other proceeding under this chapter.
(b)Remedy
The remedy available for a violation of subsection (a) shall be such legal or equitable remedy as may be appropriate to redress a violation of subsection (a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police Board
826 F. Supp. 2d 59 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Fields, Beverly v. Off Eddie Johnson
459 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee
968 F. Supp. 2d 308 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Moran v. United States Capitol Police Board
820 F. Supp. 2d 48 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
750 F. Supp. 2d 82 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Ross v. United States Capitol Police
195 F. Supp. 3d 180 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives
720 F.3d 939 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Trawick v. Hantman
151 F. Supp. 2d 54 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
847 F. Supp. 2d 57 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Jodi Breiterman v. United States Capitol Police
15 F.4th 1166 (D.C. Circuit, 2021)
Washington v. Jackson State University
532 F. Supp. 2d 804 (S.D. Mississippi, 2006)
Duncan v. Office of Compliance
541 F.3d 1377 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
Harrison v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
964 F. Supp. 2d 71 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives
793 F. Supp. 2d 294 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Joyce v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
106 F. Supp. 3d 163 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Brady v. United States Capitol Police
200 F. Supp. 3d 208 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Bradshaw v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
856 F. Supp. 2d 126 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Moran v. United States Capitol Police
82 F. Supp. 3d 117 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Dodson v. United States Capitol Police
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Doe v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 104–1, title II, §208, formerly §207, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 13; renumbered §208, Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, §1122(d)(1)(B), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1608.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 1317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/1317.