FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 22
Dispute settlement panels and procedures
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Review by President
The President shall review annually the WTO panel roster and shall include the panel roster and the list of persons serving on the Appellate Body in the annual report submitted by the President under section 2213(a) of this title.
(b)Qualifications of appointees to panels
The Trade Representative shall—
(1)seek to ensure that persons appointed to the WTO panel roster are well-qualified, and that the roster includes persons with expertise in the subject areas covered by the Uruguay Round Agreements; and
(2)inform the President of persons nominated to the roster by other WTO member countries.
(c)Rules governing conflicts of interest
The Trade Representative shall seek the establishment by the General Council and the Dispute Settlement Body of rules governing confl
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
19 U.S.C. § 3533 (Dispute settlement panels and procedures) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corus Staal BV v. Department of Commerce
395 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Union Steel v. United States
713 F.3d 1101 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States
635 F.3d 1363 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
United States Steel Corp. v. United States
621 F.3d 1351 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
George E. Warren Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
159 F.3d 616 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
American Meat Institute v. United States Department of Agriculture
968 F. Supp. 2d 38 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Jtekt Corporation v. United States
675 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (Court of International Trade, 2009)
Tembec, Inc. v. United States
441 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (Court of International Trade, 2006)
Union Steel v. United States
645 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (Court of International Trade, 2009)
Skf USA Inc. v. United States
611 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (Court of International Trade, 2009)
Nsk Ltd. v. United States
358 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (Court of International Trade, 2005)
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States
677 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (Court of International Trade, 2010)
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United States
391 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (Court of International Trade, 2005)
Stupp Corp. v. United States
359 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (Court of International Trade, 2019)
Thai Plastic Bags Indust., Co., Ltd. v. United States
895 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (Court of International Trade, 2013)
Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States
483 F. Supp. 3d 1253 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
Corus Staal BV v. United States
515 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (Court of International Trade, 2007)
United States Steel Corp. v. United States
627 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (Court of International Trade, 2009)
George E Warren Corp v. EPA
164 F.3d 676 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
Dong-A Steel Co. v. United States
337 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (Court of International Trade, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, §123, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4830.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), see section 130 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 3531 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), see section 130 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 3531 of this title.