19 U.S.C. § 2312 — Administration absent State agreement

FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 12

Administration absent State agreement

Current through Pub. L. 119-102

Title 19 — Customs Duties·Subtitle VI·Ch. 12 — TRADE ACT OF 1974·Subch. II·Pt. 2

(a)Promulgation of regulations; fair hearing In any State where there is no agreement in force between a State or its agency under section 2311 of this title, the Secretary shall arrange under regulations prescribed by him for performance of all necessary functions under subpart B of this part, including provision for a fair hearing for any worker whose application for payments is denied.

(b)Review of final determination A final determination under subsection (a) with respect to entitlement to program benefits under subpart B of this part is subject to review by the courts in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided by section 405(g) of title 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) Promulgation of regulations; fair hearing
In any State where there is no agreement in force between a State or its agency under section 2311 of this title, the Secretary shall arrange under regulations prescribed by him for performance of all necessary functions under subpart B of this part, including provision for a fair hearing for any worker whose application for payments is denied.
(b) Review of final determination
A final determination under subsection (a) with respect to entitlement to program benefits under subpart B of this part is subject to review by the courts in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided by section 405(g) of title 42.

19 U.S.C. § 2312 (Administration absent State agreement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Oralee D. Lloyd v. U. S. Department of Labor, Elaine Abts Shirley Mitchell Corine Howarter Alice v. Smith and Shirley A. Smith v. U. S. Department of Labor, Keith R. Klemme v. U. S. Department of Labor, Valorie Anne Repka v. U. S. Department of Labor, King Fox, Clarence Domingo, Warren S. Short and Robert Stevenson, on Behalf of a Group of Kaiser Steel Corporation Workers, Napa, California v. United States Department of Labor, Harold A. Bratt, Harry J. Gilman and Marvin Fooks

637 F.2d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

7 case citations

Lloyd v. U. S. Department of Labor

637 F.2d 1267 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

6 case citations

Former Employees of J.S. Designers, Inc. v. United States

13 Ct. Int'l Trade 583 (Court of International Trade, 1989)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–618, title II, §240, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2025.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Termination Date
No trade adjustment assistance, vouchers, allowances, or other payments or benefits may be provided under this part after June 30, 2022, except as otherwise provided, see section 285 of Pub. L. 93–618, as modified by section 406(a)(7) of Pub. L. 114–27, set out as notes preceding section 2271 of this title.