FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—RELIEF FROM INJURY CAUSED BY IMPORT COMPETITION

Action to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition

19 U.S.C. § 2251
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleVI
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—RELIEF FROM INJURY CAUSED BY IMPORT COMPETITION
Part1

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 2251 (Action to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 2251.

Text

(a)Presidential action If the United States International Trade Commission (hereinafter referred to in this part as the "Commission") determines under section 2252(b) of this title that an article is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof, to the domestic industry producing an article like or directly competitive with the imported article, the President, in accordance with this part, shall take all appropriate and feasible action within his power which the President determines will facilitate efforts by the domestic industry to make a positive adjustment to import competition and provide greater economic and social benefits than costs.
(b)Positive adjustment to import competition
(1)For pur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States
495 F.3d 1355 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
79 case citations
Nucor Corp. v. United States
414 F.3d 1331 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
54 case citations
Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. The United States
762 F.2d 86 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
26 case citations
Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States
477 F. Supp. 201 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
18 case citations
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States
63 F.4th 25 (Federal Circuit, 2023)
15 case citations
Solar Energy Industries Association v. United States
86 F.4th 885 (Federal Circuit, 2023)
7 case citations
Jones v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
405 N.E.2d 601 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1980)
6 case citations
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. United States
350 F. Supp. 3d 1325 (Court of International Trade, 2018)
5 case citations
Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. United States
566 F. Supp. 899 (Court of International Trade, 1983)
5 case citations
United States v. Gulla
833 F. Supp. 274 (S.D. New York, 1993)
5 case citations
Corus Group PLC v. International Trade Commission
352 F.3d 1351 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
4 case citations
Avesta AB v. United States
724 F. Supp. 974 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
3 case citations
Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States
2018 CIT 30 (Court of International Trade, 2018)
Invenergy Renewables LLC v. United States
2020 CIT 19 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump
(Federal Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Spoor
(Second Circuit, 2018)
Former Employees of Chevron USA, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor
32 F. Supp. 2d 471 (Court of International Trade, 1998)
Nucor Corp. v. United States
318 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (Court of International Trade, 2004)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–618, title II, §201, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2011; Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §106(b)(3), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 193; Pub. L. 98–573, title II, §249, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2998; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1401(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1225.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–418, in amending section generally, substituted provisions relating to action to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition for provisions relating to investigation by International Trade Commission. See section 2252 of this title.
1984—Subsec. (b)(2)(B). Pub. L. 98–573, §249(1)(A), substituted "inventory (whether maintained by domestic producers, importers, wholesalers, or retailers), and" for "inventory, and".
Subsec. (b)(2)(D). Pub. L. 98–573, §249(1)(B)–(D), added subpar. (D).
Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 98–573, §249(2), added par. (7).
1979—Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 96–39 substituted "subtitles A and B of title VII or section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930" for "the Antidumping Act, 1921, section 303 or 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1401(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1241, provided that: "The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) [enacting section 2254 of this title and amending sections 1330, 2133, 2251 to 2253, 2274, 2354, and 2703 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 2112 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 23, 1988] and shall apply with respect to investigations initiated under chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 [this part] on or after that date. Any petition filed under section 201 of such chapter [19 U.S.C. 2251] before such date of enactment, and with respect to which the United States International Trade Commission did not make a finding before such date with respect to serious injury or the threat thereof, may be withdrawn and refiled, without prejudice, by the petitioner under section 202(a) of such chapter [19 U.S.C. 2252(a)] (as amended by this section)."

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective on 15th day after Oct. 30, 1984, see section 214(a), (b) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1304 of this title.

Effective Date of 1979 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 107 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1671 of this title.

Study on Trade Adjustment Assistance for Fishermen
Pub. L. 107–210, div. A, title I, §143, Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 953, required Secretary of Commerce, not later than 1 year after Aug. 6, 2002, to conduct a study and report to Congress on appropriateness and feasibility of a trade adjustment assistance program for fishermen.

Term "Industry" To Include Producers Located in United States Insular Possessions
Pub. L. 98–67, title II, §214(f), Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 393, provided that: "For purposes of chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 [this part], the term 'industry' shall include producers located in the United States insular possessions."

Executive Documents

Ex. Ord. No. 11913. Collection of Information for Import Relief and Adjustment Assistance
Ex. Ord. No. 11913, Apr. 26, 1976, 41 F.R. 17721, provided:
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including Section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)), and as President of the United States of America, in order to reduce the reporting burden with respect to the collection of information pursuant to Title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 2011, 19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.) and consistent with Chapter 35 of Title 44 of the United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Whenever the United States International Trade Commission, in connection with investigations pursuant to Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251), collects factual data from firms on their sales, production, employment, and financial experience, the Commission shall provide such information to the Secretaries of Commerce and Labor.
Sec. 2. The Secretaries of Commerce and Labor shall ensure that the factual data, received pursuant to Section 1, are used solely for the performance of their functions pursuant to Sections 264 and 224, respectively, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2354 and 2274).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 2251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/2251.