FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Conduct of investigations and administrative reviews
19 U.S.C. § 1677m
This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1677m (Conduct of investigations and administrative reviews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1677m.
Text
(a)Treatment of voluntary responses in countervailing or antidumping duty investigations and reviews
In any investigation under part I or II of this subtitle or a review under section 1675(a) of this title in which the administering authority has, under section 1677f–1(c)(2) of this title or section 1677f–1(e)(2)(A) of this title (whichever is applicable), limited the number of exporters or producers examined, or determined a single country-wide rate, the administering authority shall establish an individual countervailable subsidy rate or an individual weighted average dumping margin for any exporter or producer not initially selected for individual examination under such sections who submits to the administering authority the information requested from exporters or producers selected fo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United States
652 F.3d 1333 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Skf USA, Inc. v. United States
537 F.3d 1373 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. v. United States
580 F.3d 1247 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
Royal Thai Government v. United States
436 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Yantai Timken Co. v. United States
521 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (Court of International Trade, 2007)
Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States
857 F.3d 1363 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
SMA Surfaces, Inc. v. United States
617 F. Supp. 3d 1263 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
GODACO Seafood Joint Stock Co. v. United States
435 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
AG der Dillinger Hüttenwerke v. United States
648 F. Supp. 3d 1321 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
Coal. for Fair Trade in Garlic v. United States
437 F. Supp. 3d 1347 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
Albemarle Corp. v. United States
2016 CIT 84 (Court of International Trade, 2016)
Washington International Insurance v. United States
34 Ct. Int'l Trade 171 (Court of International Trade, 2010)
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United States
2017 CIT 166 (Court of International Trade, 2017)
Jindal Poly Films Ltd. of India v. United States
439 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
Carpenter Tech. Corp. v. United States
477 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. v. United States
2023 CIT 33 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States
2023 CIT 22 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
AA Metals, Inc. v. United StatesPublic version: 03/10/2023.
2023 CIT 29 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
Lumimove, Inc. v. United States
2025 CIT 142 (Court of International Trade, 2025)
Risen Energy Co. v. United States
2023 CIT 48 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §782, as added Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §231(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4893; amended Pub. L. 114–27, title V, §506, June 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 386.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–27 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and inserted heading, redesignated former par. (1) and subpars. (A) and (B) as subpar. (A) and cls. (i) and (ii), respectively, added par. (2), and redesignated former par. (2) as subpar. (B) of par. (1) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (B) of par. (1) read as follows: "the number of exporters or producers who have submitted such information is not so large that individual examination of such exporters or producers would be unduly burdensome and inhibit the timely completion of the investigation."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title.
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–27 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and inserted heading, redesignated former par. (1) and subpars. (A) and (B) as subpar. (A) and cls. (i) and (ii), respectively, added par. (2), and redesignated former par. (2) as subpar. (B) of par. (1) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (B) of par. (1) read as follows: "the number of exporters or producers who have submitted such information is not so large that individual examination of such exporters or producers would be unduly burdensome and inhibit the timely completion of the investigation."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1677m, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1677m.