FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Assessment of duty

19 U.S.C. § 1671e
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIV
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartI

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1671e (Assessment of duty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1671e.

Text

(a)Publication of countervailing duty order Within 7 days after being notified by the Commission of an affirmative determination under section 1671d(b) of this title, the administering authority shall publish a countervailing duty order which—
(1)directs customs officers to assess a countervailing duty equal to the amount of the net countervailable subsidy determined or estimated to exist, within 6 months after the date on which the administering authority receives satisfactory information upon which the assessment may be based, but in no event later than 12 months after the end of the annual accounting period of the manufacturer or exporter within which the merchandise is entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption,
(2)includes a description of the subject merchandise, in suc

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLC
472 F.3d 1347 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
149 case citations
Ipsco, Inc., and Ipsco Steel, Inc. v. The United States, Lone Star Steel Company
899 F.2d 1192 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
43 case citations
Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United States
44 F. Supp. 2d 229 (Court of International Trade, 1999)
43 case citations
Ipsco, Inc. v. United States
687 F. Supp. 614 (Court of International Trade, 1988)
25 case citations
Siemens Energy, Inc. v. United States
806 F.3d 1367 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
18 case citations
Saha Thai Steel Pipe Co. v. United States
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 727 (Court of International Trade, 1993)
18 case citations
Ammex, Inc. v. United States
419 F.3d 1342 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
16 case citations
Ugine and Alz Belgium, NV v. United States
517 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (Court of International Trade, 2007)
16 case citations
Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1450 (Court of International Trade, 1996)
15 case citations
Cementos Anahuac Del Golfo, S.A. v. United States
689 F. Supp. 1191 (Court of International Trade, 1988)
13 case citations
Tembec, Inc. v. United States
461 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Court of International Trade, 2006)
13 case citations
Kyocera Solar, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
844 F.3d 1334 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
12 case citations
National Fisheries Institute, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border Protection
465 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (Court of International Trade, 2006)
12 case citations
Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United States
156 F.3d 1163 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
11 case citations
New Zealand Lamb Company, Inc. v. United States
149 F.3d 1366 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
8 case citations
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States
159 F. Supp. 2d 730 (Court of International Trade, 2001)
8 case citations
GPX International Tire Corp. v. United States
587 F. Supp. 2d 1278 (Court of International Trade, 2008)
7 case citations
Dupont Teijin Films USA, LP v. United States
27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1817 (Court of International Trade, 2003)
7 case citations
Kejriwal Iron and Steel Works, Ltd. v. United States
729 F. Supp. 1365 (Court of International Trade, 1990)
5 case citations
Ambassador Division of Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United States
577 F. Supp. 1016 (Court of International Trade, 1983)
5 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §706, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 160; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §607, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3029; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1886(a)(5), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §§218(b)(1), 233(a)(5)(O), 264(c)(9), 265, 270(a)(1)(H), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4855, 4899, 4914, 4917.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, §270(a)(1)(H), substituted "countervailable subsidy" for "subsidy".
Subsec. (a)(2) to (4). Pub. L. 103–465, §§233(a)(5)(O), 265, redesignated par. (3) as (2) and substituted "subject merchandise" for "class or kind of merchandise to which it applies", redesignated par. (4) as (3), and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows:
"(2) shall presumptively apply to all merchandise of such class or kind exported from the country investigated, except that if—
"(A) the administering authority determines there is a significant differential between companies receiving subsidy benefits, or
"(B) a State-owned enterprise is involved,
the order may provide for differing countervailing duties,".
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, §264(c)(9), substituted "1671b(d)(2)" for "1671b(d)(1)" in two places.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–465, §218(b)(1), added subsec. (c).
1986—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 99–514 realigned the margins in provisions following subpar. (B), which realignment had been editorially supplied, thereby requiring no change in text.
1984—Subsec. (a)(2) to (4). Pub. L. 98–573 added par. (2) and redesignated pars. (2) and (3) as (3) and (4), respectively.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(a) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Plan Amendments Not Required Until January 1, 1989
For provisions directing that if any amendments made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§1801–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1671e, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1671e.