FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Countervailable subsidy practices discovered during a proceeding

19 U.S.C. § 1677d
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIV
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartIV

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1677d (Countervailable subsidy practices discovered during a proceeding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1677d.

Text

If, in the course of a proceeding under this subtitle, the administering authority discovers a practice which appears to be a countervailable subsidy, but was not included in the matters alleged in a countervailing duty petition, or if the administering authority receives notice from the Trade Representative that a subsidy or subsidy program is in violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement, then the administering authority—

(1)shall include the practice, subsidy, or subsidy program in the proceeding if the practice, subsidy, or subsidy program appears to be a countervailable subsidy with respect to the merchandise which is the subject of the proceeding, or
(2)shall transfer the information (other than confidential information) concerning the practice, subsidy, or subsidy program t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Longkou Haimeng MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United States
581 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (Court of International Trade, 2008)
17 case citations
Nucor Corporation v. United States
927 F.3d 1243 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
13 case citations
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United States
195 F. Supp. 3d 1334 (Court of International Trade, 2016)
11 case citations
MacLean-fogg Company v. United States
753 F.3d 1237 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
9 case citations
Mosaic Co. v. United States
774 F. Supp. 3d 1362 (Court of International Trade, 2025)
2 case citations
SolarWorld Americas, Inc. v. United States
125 F. Supp. 3d 1318 (Court of International Trade, 2015)
1 case citations
Albemarle Corp. v. United States
2016 CIT 84 (Court of International Trade, 2016)
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
25 Ct. Int'l Trade 816 (Court of International Trade, 2001)
The Mosaic Co. v. United States
2023 CIT 134 (Court of International Trade, 2023)

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §775, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 186; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §617, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3037; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1886(a)(12), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §283(b), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4930.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "Countervailable subsidy" for "Subsidy" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "If, in the course of a proceeding under this subtitle, the administering authority discovers a practice which appears to be a subsidy, but was not included in the matters alleged in a countervailing duty petition, then the administering authority—
"(1) shall include the practice in the proceeding if it appears to be a subsidy with respect to the merchandise which is the subject of the proceeding, or
"(2) shall transfer the information concerning the practice (other than confidential information) to the library maintained under section 1677f(a)(1) of this title, if the practice appears to be a subsidy with respect to any other merchandise."
1986—Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "a proceeding" for "an proceeding" in introductory provisions.
1984—Pub. L. 98–573 substituted "proceeding" for "investigation" wherever appearing.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(a) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

Plan Amendments Not Required Until January 1, 1989
For provisions directing that if any amendments made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§1801–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1677d, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1677d.